Monolithic Molded Fluid Flow Structure for Printhead Dies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional substrate wide print bar assemblies for inkjet printers face challenges in reducing the size and spacing of printhead dies, which requires complex and costly flow structures and fabrication processes to channel printing fluid to smaller, more tightly spaced dies.

Innovation Solution

A new fluid flow structure where printhead dies are molded into an elongated monolithic body with integrated printing fluid channels, allowing direct fluid flow to the dies and enabling the use of smaller, thinner dies by eliminating the need for fluid channels in a silicon substrate, and allowing external fluid connections and attachment to other structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the size of printhead dies is reduced to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but the complexity of fluid flow structures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidfluid flow structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the printhead die mounting structure with the fluid flow distribution system into a single integrated body. The support structure includes both mechanical mounting features and molded fluid flow passages, eliminating the need for separate fluid distribution components and reducing overall system complexity despite using smaller dies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fluid flow passages are molded directly into the support structure body, nesting the fluid distribution system within the mechanical support structure. This allows fluid channels to be embedded within the same component that mounts the dies, reducing the number of separate parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Ease of manufacture

If the spacing of printhead dies is reduced to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but the complexity of fluid flow structures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidfluid flow structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses three-dimensional molded fluid flow passages that can route fluid in multiple directions and planes within the support structure body. This allows efficient fluid distribution to tightly spaced dies by utilizing vertical and lateral flow paths rather than being constrained to a single plane

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If conventional multi-part assemblies are used to channel printing fluid, then fluid distribution is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid distribution capabilityVSAvoidnumber of parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the support structure, die mounting features, and fluid flow passages into a single monolithic component. This eliminates the need for separate fluid distribution manifolds or channels that would require additional parts and assembly steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11130339B2Molded fluid flow structure
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US11130339B2 patent drawing
  • US11130339B2 patent drawing
  • US11130339B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one example, a fluid flow structure includes a micro device embedded in a monolithic molding having a channel therein through which fluid may flow directly to the device.