Molded Magnetic Component Assembly with Embedded Coils

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manufacturing of miniaturized magnetic components, such as inductors and transformers, faces challenges in reducing costs and achieving consistent performance due to difficulties in winding coils around fragile core pieces, maintaining gap sizes, and forming reliable connections between coils and terminal clips, which leads to inconsistent performance and increased manufacturing expenses.

Innovation Solution

The development of magnetic component assemblies using moldable magnetic powder sheets and coupled coils, where the magnetic material is laminated and molded around the coils to form a monolithic structure, eliminating the need for physical gaps and simplifying the assembly process, and incorporating conductive copper layers for efficient winding configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional winding methods are used to manufacture miniaturized magnetic components, then coil assembly is possible, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase due to fragile core pieces and difficult connections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the core and coil into a single integrated component where the coil is embedded within the magnetic core material. This eliminates the need for separate winding steps and assembly of fragile core pieces, directly resolving the technical contradiction by simplifying manufacturing while reducing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical winding process with a casting or molding process where the coil is formed and embedded within the magnetic core material in a single step. This substitution eliminates the complexity of manual or automated winding operations and handles the fragile core pieces issue by using a monolithic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If physical gaps are maintained in magnetic core pieces, then magnetic flux control is achieved, but manufacturing precision and consistency deteriorate due to difficulty in maintaining gap sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing precisionVSAvoidperformance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from mechanical gap formation to magnetic gap formation by controlling the magnetic properties of the core material itself. The magnetic permeability is varied within the core to create effective magnetic gaps without physical discontinuities, achieving precise flux control while maintaining manufacturing precision and performance consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite magnetic materials with varying permeability characteristics within the same monolithic structure. This allows different regions of the core to have different magnetic properties, effectively creating gap functionality without physical gaps, thereby improving manufacturing precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Power

If miniaturization is pursued to reduce device size, then power density increases, but manufacturing difficulty and cost increase due to smaller tolerances and more fragile components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower handling capabilityVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the coil and core into a single cast or molded component, eliminating the need for separate assembly steps that become increasingly difficult at miniaturized scales. This merging approach maintains ease of manufacture while achieving high power density through optimized miniaturized geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical assembly processes with a single-step casting or molding process that can reliably produce miniaturized components with tight tolerances. This substitution maintains manufacturing ease while enabling the miniaturization required for high power density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces manufacturing costs, enhances reliability, and improves performance by minimizing audible noise and variability in magnetic components, while allowing for increased power handling and reduced footprint, making it suitable for high-volume production of miniaturized components.

Implementation Method 1

a first plurality of coupled coils situated within a magnetic body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux containment: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

a second plurality of coupled coils situated within the magnetic body, the second plurality of coupled coils wound from a conductive copper layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS8659379B2Magnetic components and methods of manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2014.02.25 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US8659379B2 patent drawing
  • US8659379B2 patent drawing
  • US8659379B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Magnetic component assemblies including coil coupling arrangements, that are advantageously utilized in providing surface mount magnetic components such as inductors and transformers.