Molded Support Structure for Sintering Greenbody Misalignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

During the sintering process of greenbodies, differential shrinkage between sections can lead to misalignment and deformation of casted products, necessitating costly secondary straightening operations and reducing product yield.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a molded support structure that orients the greenbody to prevent misalignment between bulk and tail portions, with a mass and cross-sectional area ratio between 0.1 to 0.3, and using a pouring cup structure to distribute mass evenly, thereby stabilizing the product during densification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If greenbody sections with differential cross-sectional areas are fired, then sintering densification occurs, but differential shrinkage causes misalignment and deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidshape distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

A support structure with controlled mass (cross-sectional area ratio of 0.1 to 0.3 between tail and bulk portions) is integrated into the greenbody to counterbalance differential shrinkage forces during sintering. The support structure acts as a counterweight that compensates for the unequal mass distribution, preventing misalignment and deformation of the tail portion relative to the bulk portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is pre-formed and integrated into the greenbody before sintering occurs. This preliminary action ensures that the counterbalancing mass is already in position to prevent differential shrinkage effects during the densification process, rather than attempting to correct alignment after deformation occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If secondary straightening operations are performed to correct misalignment, then shape defects are addressed, but production time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidproduction cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure is pre-formed and integrated into the greenbody before sintering occurs. This preliminary action ensures that the counterbalancing mass is already in position to prevent differential shrinkage effects during the densification process, rather than attempting to correct alignment after deformation occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention converts the harmful effect of differential shrinkage into a beneficial outcome by using the support structure's controlled mass ratio (0.1 to 0.3) to create a counterbalancing effect. The very mass difference that causes shrinkage problems is transformed into a solution that prevents misalignment, eliminating the need for secondary straightening operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Strength

If extensions are supported by connection to a body during firing, then structural integrity is maintained, but gravitational forces cause misshapening of extensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidextension deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure with controlled mass ratio (0.1 to 0.3 between tail and bulk portions) acts as a counterweight that compensates for gravitational forces acting on extensions during firing. By positioning this counterbalancing mass strategically, the greenbody achieves better weight distribution that prevents extensions from sagging or deforming under gravity while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the need for secondary straightening operations, minimizing tailwag and camber misalignment, resulting in more precise and cost-effective production of casted medical device parts with reduced deformation.

Implementation Method 1

During the heating and densification, the greenbody has a tendency to shrink

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShrinkage: Thermal Contraction

Implementation Method 2

sections of a greenbody that are extensions supported by a connection to a body can become misshapen during firing due to gravitational forces acting on the extension

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational forces: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS7914901B2Support structures for molded parts
Publication Date: 2011.03.29 CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL
  • US7914901B2 patent drawing
  • US7914901B2 patent drawing
  • US7914901B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Structures and methods for hindering molded part deformation during densification are discussed. Such devices and techniques can help alleviate stresses that tend to result in part deformation during firing, sintering, or other densification processes, and thus reduce the need for secondary straightening operations post-densification. In some instances, a support structure is utilized to orient a molded greenbody in a preferred direction to reduce deformation during firing (e.g., orienting a thin tail section is a plane parallel to the direction of gravity). The support structure can also be part of, or the entirety of, a thermal mass to help alleviate stresses that lead to part deformation. Though such structures and methods can be used for any molded piece, it can be particularly used to create a portion, or an entirety of, a medical device such as a jaw of an surgical instrument.