Molding Clamp Strain-Gauge Control for Precise Force Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current injection molding systems face challenges in accurately monitoring and controlling clamping force and pressure within the mold cavity, particularly in areas with complex geometries, due to limitations with external strain gauge sensors that can pick up noise and require extensive testing to identify effective measurement areas, leading to potential defects and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The use of external strain gauge sensors placed on the mold surface or within cavity blocks to measure strain changes, which are amplified to distinguish meaningful measurements from noise, allowing for precise control of clamp force and movement based on target strain profiles, enabling more accurate pressure estimation and reduced energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If external strain gauge sensors are placed on the mold surface to measure strain changes, then clamping force monitoring capability is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to noise pickup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrain measurement accuracyVSAvoidnoise interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the strain measurement function into multiple distributed strain gauges placed at different locations on the mold surface. By dividing the measurement task across multiple sensors, the system can identify and filter out noise signals that do not correlate with actual clamping force changes, thereby improving measurement precision despite the presence of noise interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The strain gauge system is designed to serve multiple functions: it monitors clamping force, detects mold filling status, and provides feedback for process control. This multi-functionality allows the system to distinguish between relevant strain signals (related to clamping force) and noise by analyzing patterns across different operational phases, thereby maintaining measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If extensive testing is performed to identify effective measurement areas for strain gauges, then measurement reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to extended setup time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidmold setup speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-determining optimal strain gauge placement locations based on theoretical stress analysis and finite element modeling before actual mold installation. This pre-planning eliminates the need for extensive trial-and-error testing during mold setup, thereby maintaining measurement reliability while significantly improving productivity by reducing setup time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a standardized strain gauge placement template that can be replicated across different mold types and sizes. This copying approach allows rapid deployment of reliable measurement systems without requiring extensive custom testing for each new mold, thus balancing reliability with productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If clamp force is increased to ensure proper mold closure, then manufacturing precision is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart formation qualityVSAvoidclamping energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic clamping force adjustment based on real-time strain gauge feedback. The clamp force is continuously modified during the molding process to maintain optimal levels for proper mold closure and part quality, rather than applying excessive force throughout. This dynamic control ensures manufacturing precision while minimizing energy consumption by applying only the necessary clamping force at each moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses strain gauge measurements as feedback to automatically adjust clamp force levels. The feedback loop monitors actual clamping conditions and modifies the applied force to achieve the minimum necessary for quality part formation, thereby preventing energy waste from excessive clamping while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for improved control of clamp force and movement, reducing defects and energy consumption by providing a more accurate estimation of melt pressure and consistent force delivery throughout the molding process, while being portable and cost-effective across different molds and systems.

Implementation Method 1

using at least one strain gauge and increasing or decreasing the rate or force of an electric or hydraulic clamping unit based on the sensed change in strain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain measurement: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS10974430B2Method for controlling a rate or force of a clamp in a molding system using one or more strain gauges
Publication Date: 2021.04.13 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US10974430B2 patent drawing
  • US10974430B2 patent drawing
  • US10974430B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of monitoring and controlling a molding clamping apparatus in an injection molding or other molding process is disclosed. The method includes creating a target strain profile, receiving a deviation limit, receiving a change in strain relating to a mold while it is closing from a first strain gauge, identifying a deviation from a target strain profile based on the output from the first strain gauge, determining that the deviation exceeds the deviation limit, and adjusting the rate or force of clamp movement. The target strain profile may have a first portion relating to a clamp closing process, a second portion relating to a filling process, and a third portion relating to a clamp opening process. The first portion relating to the clamp closing process may include an intermediate portion relating to a coining process having an intermediate clamp force setpoint.