Molding Machine Condition Correction Using Multi-Learner Direction Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning-based systems for correcting operating conditions in industrial machines, such as injection molding machines, often produce reverse proposals that worsen product defects due to incomplete correction accuracy.

Innovation Solution

An operating condition correction method and device that acquire measurement and inspection data, use multiple learners to calculate correction quantities, determine the appropriateness of correction directions, and exclude reverse proposals by selecting only accurate correction quantities for adjusting operating conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single learner is used to calculate correction quantity, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of correction decreases due to reverse proposals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of learners
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the correction calculation task by employing multiple learners (e.g., first learner, second learner, third learner) that each independently calculate correction quantities for different aspects of the molding conditions. This segmentation allows the system to evaluate multiple correction directions and select the most appropriate one, thereby improving reliability while managing complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the outputs of multiple learners by integrating their correction quantities through a unified selection process. The correction quantity calculation unit combines the results from multiple learners and selects the most appropriate correction quantity, achieving improved reliability through collective decision-making while maintaining systematic organization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If multiple learners are used to calculate correction quantity, then the reliability of correction improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of learners
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the correction calculation task by employing multiple learners (e.g., first learner, second learner, third learner) that each independently calculate correction quantities for different aspects of the molding conditions. This segmentation allows the system to evaluate multiple correction directions and select the most appropriate one, thereby improving reliability while managing complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple learners are designed with universal functionality to handle different types of defects and molding conditions. Each learner can process measurement data and inspection data to generate correction quantities, making the system versatile and adaptable to various scenarios while maintaining a consistent operational framework that manages complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If correction quantity is calculated without verifying correction direction, then the processing speed is improved, but the manufacturing precision decreases due to reverse proposals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolding condition accuracyVSAvoidcorrection processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification of correction directions before finalizing correction quantities. The correction quantity calculation unit checks whether correction quantities from multiple learners have consistent correction directions (e.g., all positive or all negative for the same molding condition). This preliminary action prevents reverse proposals from being applied, ensuring manufacturing precision while minimizing time loss through efficient validation logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240359382A1Operating condition correction method, operating condition correction device, molding machine and non-transitory computer readable recording medium
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 THE JAPAN STEEL WORKS LTD
  • US20240359382A1 patent drawing
  • US20240359382A1 patent drawing
  • US20240359382A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An operating condition correction method of an industrial machine, comprises: acquiring measurement data obtained by measuring a state of the industrial machine and inspection data obtained by inspecting a state of a product manufactured by the industrial machine; calculating a correction quantity of the operating condition based on the acquired measurement data and inspection data using a plurality of learners trained with an association between the measurement data as well as the inspection data and a correction quantity of the operating condition; determining appropriateness of a correction direction of each of a plurality of the correction quantities calculated using the plurality of learners; and correcting the operating condition based on one or more of the correction quantities determined as having the correction direction being appropriate.