Molding Die Surface Texture Control via Local Roughness Differentiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing molding dies fail to produce metal members with controlled surface textures, leading to unsatisfactory surface finishes due to manufacturing-induced unevenness on the inner wall surfaces, which affects the precision and cleanliness of the final product.

Innovation Solution

A molding die design featuring a tubular portion with a smoother inner wall surface compared to the base portion, where the cut level difference in the roughness curve is minimized to enhance surface texture control and improve mold release properties, using ceramics like aluminum oxide for the die components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the inner wall surface of the molding die is made smooth to improve surface texture control, then manufacturing precision improves, but mold release properties deteriorate due to increased adherence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface texture controlVSAvoidadherence to mold surface
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different surface roughness characteristics to different regions of the molding die inner wall surface. Specifically, the cylindrical portion has a smaller cut level difference (Rδc1) for smooth surface texture control, while the bottom portion has a larger cut level difference (Rδc2) to reduce adherence and improve mold release properties. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between smooth surface requirements and mold release requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If the inner wall surface is polished to reduce roughness, then surface finish improves, but manufacturing complexity increases due to additional processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finishVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls the cut level difference parameter (Rδc) during the manufacturing process to achieve the desired surface characteristics. By specifying that Rδc1 in the cylindrical portion is smaller than Rδc2 in the bottom portion, the patent establishes a quantitative parameter control approach that achieves surface finish improvement through controlled manufacturing parameters rather than complex multi-step polishing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables the production of metal members with highly controlled surface textures and improved mold release properties, reducing adherence issues and enhancing cleaning efficiency, suitable for applications like electrophotographic photoreceptors and roller bearings.

Implementation Method 1

causing adsorption of the tubular portion and the base portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS11958263B2Molding die and manufacturing method for the same
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 KYOCERA CORP
  • US11958263B2 patent drawing
  • US11958263B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A molding die according to the present disclosure includes a tubular portion and a base portion that closes an end portion of the tubular portion at one side. A cut level difference Rδc1 in a roughness curve of an inner wall surface of the tubular portion is smaller than a cut level difference Rδc2 in a roughness curve of an inner wall bottom portion of the base portion. The cut level difference represents a difference between a cut level at a load length ratio of 25% in a roughness curve and a cut level at a load length ratio of 75% in the roughness curve.