Molding Machine Action Sequencing for Dependency-Aware Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Molding machine operations are complex and often rely on operator experience, leading to inconsistent procedures, potential errors, and underutilization of machine potential, as existing methods fail to comprehensively account for all influencing factors and dependencies.

Innovation Solution

A method that automatically sorts actions based on dependencies between tasks, allowing operators to define tasks without requiring expertise, and adapts to changes, considering machine, tool, and process-specific dependencies, including circular interdependencies, to provide optimized sequences of actions for molding machine operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the operator relies on experience and intuition to operate the molding machine, then the operator can handle complex situations, but inconsistent procedures prevail and errors can occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational consistencyVSAvoidoperator dependency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-service by automatically generating the sorted sequence of actions based on predefined dependencies, eliminating the need for operator expertise in sequencing. The control unit autonomously determines the correct order of operations, ensuring consistency while reducing operator burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The dependencies between actions are predefined and stored in advance. When a task is initiated, the system retrieves and sorts actions based on these pre-established dependencies, ensuring consistent procedural execution without requiring operator experience or intuition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If existing methods assist the operator with initial settings, then basic process capability is achieved, but they are limited to particular subprocesses and do not account for all influencing factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive task coverageVSAvoidsystem completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to handle multiple task types (operation, startup, shutdown, maintenance, optimization) through a universal action sorting mechanism. The same dependency-based sorting approach applies to all task categories, providing comprehensive coverage without requiring separate specialized systems for each subprocess.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The complex task of molding machine operation is segmented into discrete actions with defined dependencies. Each action is independently defined and sorted based on its relationships with other actions, allowing the system to comprehensively cover all influencing factors while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If the operator creates a sequence of working steps interactively, then customization is possible, but the process becomes a trial-and-error endeavor for operators with less knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask definition simplicityVSAvoidsequence creation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs the time-consuming sequence creation automatically by sorting actions based on predefined dependencies. The operator simply defines the task, and the system self-generates the optimized sequence, eliminating trial-and-error and significantly reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The dependencies between all possible actions are predefined and stored in advance. When the operator defines a task, the system immediately retrieves and sorts the relevant actions based on these pre-computed dependencies, providing instant optimized sequences without requiring iterative adjustment or operator expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If the molding machine operates without comprehensive assistance, then the full potential of the machine can be utilized, but the operator must have extensive knowledge of dependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine potential utilizationVSAvoidoperator expertise requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit autonomously manages the complexity of action sequencing and dependency management. It automatically sorts actions and provides comprehensive assistance for all task types, enabling full machine potential utilization without requiring the operator to possess extensive knowledge of operational dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240345559A1Method for operating a shaping machine
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 ENGEL AUSTRIA
  • US20240345559A1 patent drawing
  • US20240345559A1 patent drawing
  • US20240345559A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a molding machine includes providing dependencies between, in particular unsorted and/or partially circularly interdependent, actions for performing at least one task. The at least one task is or comprises an operation, a startup or shutdown, a maintenance and/or an optimization of a molding process and/or a molding machine and/or a mold. The method further includes sorting the actions based on the dependencies between the actions.