Injection Molding Component Replacement Timing With Lead Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing injection molding machines do not account for the procurement time of components nearing the end of their service life, leading to potential downtime as components may fail before they can be replaced, especially for custom or overseas orders.

Innovation Solution

An injection molding machine with a control device that estimates the service life of components and provides recommendation for replacement, including an estimated lead time for procurement, allowing for timely acquisition and minimizing downtime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If service life estimation is provided without lead time information, then managers can order components early, but components may fail before acquisition due to long procurement time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent availabilityVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control device performs preliminary calculation of the advance notice date by subtracting lead time from the estimated service life date. This allows the system to prompt component ordering in advance, ensuring components are acquired before failure occurs. The preliminary action of calculating and communicating the advance notice date resolves the contradiction by providing sufficient lead time for procurement while maintaining reliable component availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the component management process into distinct time phases: service life monitoring, lead time calculation, advance notice generation, and replacement execution. By dividing the timeline into manageable segments with specific milestones (estimated service life date, advance notice date), the system enables proactive planning that prevents downtime while ensuring component availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If component replacement is delayed until failure occurs, then procurement time is minimized, but production downtime increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoidprocurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by calculating the advance notice date before component failure occurs. This allows procurement activities to be initiated in advance, transforming the sequence from reactive (order after failure detection) to proactive (order before failure based on predicted timeline). The preliminary calculation of replacement timing ensures operational continuity while accounting for necessary procurement time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides a time cushion by establishing the advance notice date as a buffer between current time and estimated service life date. This cushion accounts for procurement lead time, creating a safety margin that prevents component failure during operation. The beforehand cushioning ensures that even with varying procurement times, the component is replaced before failure, maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If advance notice period is extended to account for long lead time, then component acquisition is timely, but replacement may occur too early reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimely component acquisitionVSAvoidreplacement timing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the advance notice period based on component-specific lead time parameters. By changing the time parameter according to actual procurement requirements (short for domestic, long for overseas), the system optimizes both timely acquisition and replacement efficiency. Each component receives a customized advance notice date that balances early enough for procurement while minimizing premature replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different advance notice periods to different components based on their specific procurement characteristics. Components with long lead times (overseas orders) receive earlier advance notice dates, while those with short lead times (domestic orders) receive later notice. This localized quality approach ensures each component is replaced at the optimal time, balancing timely acquisition with replacement efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240280966A1Injection molding machine and method of providing component replacement recommendation information for injection molding machine
Publication Date: 2024.08.22 THE JAPAN STEEL WORKS LTD
  • US20240280966A1 patent drawing
  • US20240280966A1 patent drawing
  • US20240280966A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An injection molding machine includes a control device configured to estimate a service life for a plurality of managed components among components of an injection molding machine. The control device is configured to manage, for each of the managed components, a usage start date, an estimated service life date, and an estimated lead time. In a case where one or a plurality of the managed components reaches an advance notice date, the control device is configured to: take the managed component as a recommended replacement component; and provide component replacement recommendation information including information to prompt replacement and the estimated lead time for the recommended replacement component.