Molecular Embedding Learning Across Flexible 3D Conformers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning models struggle to generalize across diverse molecular geometries due to the flexibility and conformational variability of molecules, leading to inaccurate predictions of molecular properties like binding affinity and pharmacokinetics.

Innovation Solution

A molecular analysis model is trained using non-contrastive auxiliary task learning to generate embeddings for augmented molecular structures, minimizing differences within conformers while maximizing differences between conformers, thus enhancing generalization across molecular geometries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional machine learning models are used for molecular property prediction, then the model structure is simple, but the model fails to generalize across diverse molecular geometries due to conformational variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization across molecular geometriesVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by generating multiple augmented samples from each molecular conformer before training the model. These augmented samples incorporate various geometric transformations and noise patterns that pre-condition the model to handle conformational variability, enabling better generalization across diverse molecular geometries while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by modifying key parameters including generating multiple conformers with different geometric configurations, applying augmented samples with varying transformation parameters, and employing a loss function that specifically penalizes variations due to geometric transformations while preserving chemically meaningful differences. This enables the model to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant geometric variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the model is trained to distinguish between conformers, then the model can accurately determine molecular properties, but the training complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel training complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the training process into distinct components: generating multiple conformers, creating augmented samples for each conformer, computing embeddings, and applying a specialized loss function that separately handles intra-conformer and inter-conformer distinctions. This segmented approach manages training complexity by breaking down the complex task into manageable, modular steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism by using embeddings as a intermediate representation between the raw molecular structures and the final property predictions. The embedding layer transforms complex molecular geometries into a compressed feature space, and the non-contrastive auxiliary loss function acts as an intermediary training objective that guides the embedding learning before the main property prediction task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If augmented samples are generated by modifying three-dimensional structure, then the model learns geometric invariance, but the computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric invarianceVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by generating a controlled number of augmented samples (e.g., 3-10 samples per conformer) rather than exhaustive sampling. This partial sampling is sufficient to teach geometric invariance while avoiding the excessive computational cost of generating and processing all possible geometric variations, achieving a practical balance between learning effectiveness and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260024627A1Non-contrastive auxiliary loss based learning for machine learning enabled molecular analysis
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 GENENTECH INC
  • US20260024627A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024627A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024627A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A molecular analysis model may be trained to generalize across multiple molecular geometries by modifying a three-dimensional structure of one or more conformers of a molecule to generate. for each conformer. a plurality of augmented samples. The molecular analysis model may be trained to generate an embedding for each augmented sample while minimizing a difference between the plurality of embeddings resulting therefrom. Furthermore. the molecular analysis model may be trained to determine, based at least on the plurality of embeddings. a value of a molecular property for the molecule. The trained molecular analysis model may be applied in the determination of the value of the molecular property for another molecule.