Molecular Evaluation Method for Cell State Transition Mechanisms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack a mechanistic understanding of how cellular networks drive cell state transitions, making it difficult to purposefully manipulate and control cell states, and existing predictive methods do not provide insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in cell state transitions.

Innovation Solution

A molecular evaluation method that processes data to identify cell states, constructs a hypersurface separating these states, generates a state transition vector, and calculates a causal network graph to predict the molecular mechanisms of perturbations affecting cell state transitions, using RNA expression, protein expression, and posttranslational modifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If computational models and lineage analysis are used to characterize cell state transitions, then the ability to describe transitions between states is improved, but the mechanistic understanding of how cellular networks drive these transitions remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharacterization of cell state transitionsVSAvoidmechanistic understanding of cellular networks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational framework that connects observed cell state transitions with underlying molecular mechanisms. This framework uses gene expression data and network models as intermediaries to infer causal relationships between molecular processes and phenotypic transitions, thereby recovering the mechanistic information that was lost in conventional approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/morphological observation methods with a computational systems biology approach. Instead of directly observing cellular mechanisms through microscopy or physical assays, the method uses computational models that process gene expression data to infer molecular network dynamics and their causal role in driving cell state transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If morphological features and statistical multivariate methods are used to separate cell states, then the ability to distinguish cell states is improved, but the predictive value for designing perturbations to achieve desired cell states is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation of cell statesVSAvoidprediction and design of perturbations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using the inferred molecular network models to predict the effects of perturbations on cell state transitions. The system continuously refines its predictions by comparing observed transition outcomes with model predictions, thereby improving its ability to design effective perturbations for achieving desired cell states while maintaining accurate state separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computational analysis to infer the molecular network structure and dynamics before actually designing and applying perturbations. This preliminary modeling phase allows the system to predict which perturbations will effectively drive transitions between cell states, thereby guiding subsequent experimental interventions with pre-computed optimal strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If global analysis methods are used to connect phenotypes with molecular processes, then the molecular resolution of cell state characterization is improved, but the ability to purposefully manipulate and control cell states remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemolecular resolution of cell statesVSAvoidmanipulation and control of cell states
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used to describe cell states from static molecular profiles to dynamic network states that capture the flow of information and material through cellular pathways. By representing cell states in terms of network fluxes and activity levels rather than simple gene expression levels, the method enables predictive control through targeted perturbations that modify these dynamic parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics by modeling cellular networks as time-varying systems where molecular interactions continuously evolve. The inferred network models capture temporal patterns of gene expression and protein activity, allowing the system to predict how dynamic perturbations will drive transitions between cell states. This dynamic representation transforms static molecular snapshots into controllable process models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240274226A1Molecular evaluation methods
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 UNIV COLLEGE DUBLIN NAT UNIV OF IRELAND DUBLIN
  • US20240274226A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274226A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274226A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A molecular evaluation method for predicting the molecular mechanisms through which a perturbation promotes or inhibits a cellular transition from a first cell state to a second cell state. Cells are clustered in a multi-dimensional representation to identify distinct cell states, with dimensions corresponding to molecular features, which are ranked according to a vector component directed towards a separating hypersurface. Core network components are identified with the highest ranking and a reduced dimension space is used, without the core component dimensions, to assess the effects of perturbations in terms of a Dynamic Phenotype Descriptor (DPD) which represents the remainder of the global network on which the core network acts. Bayesian Modular Response Analysis is used to reconstruct the topology and signs and strengths of causal connections between nodes of the core network and the DPD. A resulting mechanistic model based on ordinary differential equations (ODE) is derived that calculates the quality and quantity of changes which are needed to convert one cell state into another permitting interventions to be identified that will promote or inhibit particular cell transitions.