Molecular Hopper Track Motion for Processive Cargo Transport

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling molecular motion, such as using molecular or optical tweezers, are complex and not readily applicable in biotechnology, necessitating simpler systems that can achieve directional motion, processivity, and cargo transport without leaving a track.

Innovation Solution

A molecular hopper that binds to primary functional groups on a track, allowing directional transfer along the track by applying a driving force, with optional cargo transport, and can reverse direction through external control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If molecular tweezers or optical tweezers are used to control molecular motion, then precise manipulation of analytes with nanometer precision is achieved, but the system complexity increases and applicability in biotechnology decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenanometer precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical systems (molecular tweezers, optical tweezers) with a simpler molecular hopper system that uses chemical binding interactions between a secondary functional group on the hopper and primary functional groups on the track. This substitution maintains nanometer-scale precision while dramatically reducing system complexity and enabling biotechnological applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The molecular hopper system is self-driven through chemical binding and unbinding events, eliminating the need for external control equipment. The hopper autonomously moves along the track by sequentially binding to primary functional groups, with direction controlled simply by adjusting the driving force polarity, thus removing complex external manipulation apparatus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If biological machines like DNA polymerase or molecular motors are used, then processivity and directional motion are achieved, but the system complexity increases and ease of application decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveprocessivityVSAvoidease of application
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simplified copy of biological motor function using synthetic chemical components. Instead of using complex biological molecules like kinesin or DNA polymerase, the invention uses a synthetic molecular hopper with functional groups that replicate the binding-movement-unbinding cycle of biological motors, achieving similar processivity with much simpler, more applicable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls the direction and processivity of molecular motion by changing the parameters of the driving force (electrical potential polarity). By simply reversing the polarity of the applied voltage, the direction of hopper movement is reversed, providing easy control without changing the fundamental system architecture or using complex biological regulation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If a molecular hopper system is designed with simple components, then ease of manufacture and application improve, but achieving true processivity and directional control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of componentsVSAvoidprocessivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamics to the simple molecular hopper system through the application of an external driving force (electrical potential). The hopper's binding and unbinding events are dynamically controlled by the applied voltage, allowing the system to achieve directed processive motion despite the simplicity of its static components. The system transitions from static chemical groups to a dynamically controlled transport mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the driving force (electrical potential) as an intermediary to couple the simple molecular hopper components to achieve processive directional motion. The electrical field mediates between the chemical binding interactions and the desired mechanical transport, enabling control over movement direction and persistence without complicating the hopper's fundamental structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The molecular hopper achieves autonomous, highly processive, and directional movement along a track, capable of transporting cargo without dissociation, addressing the need for simpler and more effective molecular manipulation.

Implementation Method 1

the hopper comprises a secondary functional group capable of binding to each of the plurality of primary functional groups on the track

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical binding: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS20250224411A1Molecular hopper
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 OXFORD UNIVERSITY INNOVATION LTD
  • US20250224411A1 patent drawing
  • US20250224411A1 patent drawing
  • US20250224411A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods for moving molecular hoppers along tracks; methods of characterising an analyte using molecular hoppers; kits for characterising an analyte; and molecule hoppers per se and systems comprising such hoppers. The invention particularly relates to the use of such methods and kits in the characterisation of analytes.