Molecular Imaging Quantification for Inflammation-Guided Therapy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for selecting drug treatments for inflammatory diseases are sub-optimal, leading to high failure rates and inefficiencies in healthcare due to patient heterogeneity, and there is a need for better patient stratification in clinical trials and therapeutic interventions.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining disease measures using in vivo molecular imaging, which involves correcting marker signal for tissue structure and vascular flow effects to accurately quantify biological targets like inflammatory proteins, enabling precise selection of disease-modifying therapies without invasive procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If patient selection is based on blood biomarkers, then treatment selection can be performed, but the accuracy and reliability of predicting treatment response is sub-optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of treatment response predictionVSAvoidreliability of treatment selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces blood biomarker testing with in vivo molecular imaging techniques (PET/SPECT) to assess disease activity and inflammation. This substitution enables direct visualization and quantification of biological processes in the target organ, providing more accurate and reliable predictions of treatment response compared to indirect blood-based markers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the measurement parameters from blood biomarker concentrations to imaging metrics such as standardized uptake value (SUV), binding potential, and inflammation quantification. These imaging parameters provide more precise and reliable information about disease activity and treatment response, enabling better patient selection and stratification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple drugs are trialed to find the effective one, then treatment effectiveness can be achieved, but time and healthcare resources are wasted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidtime for treatment selection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables preliminary assessment of disease activity, inflammation, and biological target expression before treatment initiation. By using in vivo molecular imaging to quantify these parameters, clinicians can predict which patients are most likely to respond to specific therapies, allowing for more informed treatment selection and reducing the need to trial multiple drugs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent provides quantitative imaging feedback about disease activity and treatment response that can be used to guide treatment decisions. This feedback mechanism allows for more accurate prediction of treatment effectiveness, enabling clinicians to select the most appropriate drug earlier and reduce the time required to identify effective therapy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If invasive tissue biopsy is used to visualize inflammation, then direct measurement of disease is possible, but the procedure is invasive and limited in scope

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect measurement of diseaseVSAvoidinvasiveness of procedure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces invasive tissue biopsy with non-invasive in vivo molecular imaging (PET/SPECT) to visualize and quantify inflammation and disease activity. This substitution maintains the ability to directly measure disease processes while eliminating the invasiveness and tissue damage associated with biopsies, and extends measurement capability to the entire organ system rather than a localized sample.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise selection of effective therapies for individual patients by quantifying inflammatory processes non-invasively, reducing healthcare costs and improving treatment efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

These techniques make use of radiopharmaceuticals such as radiolabelled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) or radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies to visualise processes, cells or cytokines associated with immune responses.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadioactive Tracing: Radioactive Tracing

Data Source

PatentUS20260105599A1Apparatus and method for monitoring disease
Publication Date: 2026.04.16 UNIV OF SOUTHAMPTON
  • US20260105599A1 patent drawing
  • US20260105599A1 patent drawing
  • US20260105599A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a measure of disease in a region of the body of a subject. The method receives imaging data from imaging the region of the body of the subject having data representative of a distribution of a marker within the region administered to the subject prior to the imaging. The marker binds to a biological target related to the disease. The imaging data is processed to obtain a measure of marker signal in the region. The measure of marker signal is corrected for an effect on the marker signal of tissue structure within the region. The measure of the disease is determined for the region using the corrected measure of marker signal. Also provided is an apparatus configured to carry out the method.