Molecular Layer Etching of Metal-Organic Films

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current atomic layer etching (ALE) methods are limited by slow etch rates and the inability to safely and effectively remove soft materials like polymers and metal organics, posing safety concerns and restricting their use in semiconductor and microelectronic device manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

A molecular layer etching (MLE) process using a gas-phase thermal chemical method with lithium and trimethylaluminum precursors, which enables the controlled, HF-free removal of metal-organic films in a layer-by-layer fashion, achieving higher etch rates and selective etching of organic and inorganic hybrid materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If HF-based atomic layer etching (ALE) is used, then etching capability for metal oxides is achieved, but safety concerns arise and etch rates are limited to approximately 1 Angstrom/cycle

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidetch rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the etching process by replacing HF-based chemistry with alternative chemistries (e.g., Cl2-based, I2-based, or organometallic precursors) that provide both safety improvements and enhanced etch rates while maintaining atomic-layer precision. This parameter substitution resolves the contradiction between safety and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the chemical mechanism by replacing HF-based chemical reactions with alternative chemical systems that achieve etching through different reaction pathways, thereby eliminating the safety hazards of HF while maintaining or improving etching performance and rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional ALE methods are used, then metal oxide etching is achieved, but the ability to remove soft materials (polymers, metal organics) has not been demonstrated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal capabilityVSAvoidetching precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent develops a universal etching chemistry platform that can etch multiple material types including metal oxides, polymers, and metal organics using the same atomic-layer etching approach. This multi-functionality enables the removal of soft materials while maintaining the precision and control characteristic of ALE processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the chemical parameters by selecting precursors and reaction conditions specifically tailored for organic and hybrid materials, enabling the etching of soft materials while maintaining atomic-layer precision through self-limiting reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If layer-by-layer etching of soft materials is implemented, then sub-nanometer thickness control is achieved, but new fabrication techniques and processes are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethickness controlVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs self-limiting chemical reactions that automatically terminate when a monolayer is formed, providing inherent thickness control without requiring complex real-time monitoring or feedback systems. The chemistry itself serves the function of controlling the etching depth, simplifying the overall process complexity while achieving sub-nanometer precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

MLE provides safer, faster etch rates (0.4-4 nm/cycle) and enables precise control over film thickness, allowing for new fabrication techniques and the use of soft materials as sacrificial layers in microelectronics and semiconductor manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

performing an etching cycle comprising a first half reaction and a second half reaction. The first half reaction exposes a first etching precursor comprising a gaseous lithium precursor to the coating on the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

The second half reaction exposes a second etching precursor, which comprises trimethylaluminum, to the coating at a second half reaction temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

exposes a first etching precursor comprising a gaseous lithium precursor to the coating on the substrate at a first half reaction temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11257682B2Molecular layer etching
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 UCHICAGO ARGONNE LLC
  • US11257682B2 patent drawing
  • US11257682B2 patent drawing
  • US11257682B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of etching an organic or hybrid inorganic/organic material. The method etches molecular layer deposition coatings. An etching cycle comprises a first half reaction exposing the coating to a precursor. A second half reaction exposes a second precursor, removing or etching a portion of the coating.