Molecular Sequence Design Platform for Fragment Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software tools for visualizing and designing molecular sequences lack an intuitive and biologically-informed interface for high-throughput sequence design, making it difficult for researchers to effectively model fragment preparation and assembly, especially in large-scale molecular biology applications such as DNA, RNA, and amino acid sequencing.

Innovation Solution

A bioinformatics platform with a user-friendly interface that models both fragment preparation and assembly methods, allowing for customizable design of molecular constructs using techniques like Golden Gate, Gibson, and homology methods, while providing a unified interface for cloning and concatenation, and enabling easy traceability and reusability of sequence designs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If current software tools are used for molecular sequence design, then basic design functionality is provided, but the interface lacks intuitiveness and biological information, making it difficult for researchers to effectively model fragment preparation and assembly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintuitiveness of interfaceVSAvoidcomplexity of modeling fragment preparation and assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The software interface is segmented into distinct functional modules including fragment selection tools, assembly method selection (Golden Gate, Gibson, homology), and visualization components. Each module handles a specific aspect of construct design, allowing researchers to interact with complex processes through simplified, focused interfaces rather than a monolithic complex system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The software performs preliminary actions by automatically generating fragment combinations based on selected assembly methods before the researcher finalizes the design. The system pre-calculates compatibility, prepares assembly protocols, and models outcomes in advance, reducing the cognitive load during the actual design process and making the interface more intuitive

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If high-throughput sequence design is performed to generate large numbers of sequence combinations, then productivity is improved, but the complexity of managing and tracking construct information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of sequence combinations generatedVSAvoidcomplexity of managing construct information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The software creates digital copies and representations of molecular constructs in a standardized database format, allowing researchers to manage thousands of sequence combinations through structured data objects rather than physical documentation. Each construct is represented as a digital entity with traceable metadata, enabling efficient storage, retrieval, and manipulation of high-throughput design outputs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds dimensional organization to construct management by implementing hierarchical categorization (project levels, construct sets, individual constructs) and temporal tracking (design history, version control). This multi-dimensional structuring allows researchers to navigate and manage large numbers of constructs through organized dimensions rather than flat lists, reducing management complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If fragment combinations are limited to produce only select constructs, then design precision is improved, but the time required for design and synthesis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselectivity of construct generationVSAvoidtime for design and synthesis
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The software performs preliminary filtering and compatibility assessment of fragment combinations before final construct generation. By pre-evaluating which fragments can be successfully assembled using selected methods (Golden Gate, Gibson, homology), the system eliminates incompatible combinations early, allowing researchers to focus time on validating promising candidates rather than troubleshooting failed assemblies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback mechanisms that allow researchers to iteratively refine fragment selection criteria based on preliminary results. The software analyzes assembly success probabilities, compatibility scores, and resource requirements, feeding this information back to guide selective construct generation. This feedback loop enables precise selectivity while minimizing time investment through data-driven decision making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240274236A1Molecular sequence design tools
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 BENCHLING INC
  • US20240274236A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274236A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274236A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for automatically generating molecular constructs. One of the methods includes generating a user interface presentation for automatically generating different combinations of molecular sequences, wherein the user interface presentation presents a sequence of bins for generating a molecular construct. Each bin is associated with data representing a respective plurality of fragments for generating the molecular construct. A plurality of different construct combinations are generated representing different variations of the construct, including selecting, for each different construct combination, one fragment from each bin in the sequence of bins.