Molecule Moiety Optimization Using Pharmacophore-Guided Building Blocks
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing methods for designing medical molecules are inefficient and time-consuming, often relying on local chemical space exploitation or manual optimization, which fail to identify new molecules with specific mechanisms of action and minimal side effects within a reasonable time frame.
Innovation Solution
A computer-implemented method using a graphical user interface to design molecules by optimizing a drug score, involving the separation of a molecule into moieties, determining a moiety pharmacophore, and rearranging molecular building blocks to enhance the drug score, leveraging collective intelligence and physics simulation for rapid optimization.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Device complexity
If optimization algorithms exploit only local environment around predefined starting structures, then computational complexity is reduced, but the ability to find globally optimal molecules with specific mechanisms of action is limited
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the molecule into multiple moieties (e.g., head, body, tail groups) that can be independently optimized. This segmentation allows the optimization algorithm to work with smaller, more manageable units while still achieving global optimization of the complete molecule. Each moiety can be optimized for specific pharmacological properties, and the combination of optimized moieties yields a globally optimal molecule.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent introduces a new dimension to the optimization problem by incorporating pharmacophore matching as an additional optimization criterion beyond local chemical space exploitation. This multi-dimensional approach combines local structural optimization with global pharmacological property optimization, enabling the system to find molecules that satisfy both computational efficiency and global optimality requirements.
2Reliability
If manual optimization by persons skilled in the art is used, then molecules can be optimized for specific pharmacological properties, but the process is comparably complicated and time consuming
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements self-service optimization through automated algorithms that perform moiety decomposition and pharmacophore matching without human intervention. The system automatically identifies optimal moieties, generates candidate structures, evaluates pharmacological properties, and iterates to find optimized molecules. This automation maintains the high optimization quality previously requiring expert manual work while dramatically reducing the time required.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual molecular optimization with an automated computational system. Instead of relying on human experts to manually manipulate molecular structures, the system uses algorithms to automatically perform decomposition, generation, evaluation, and optimization steps, substituting human intellectual labor with automated computational processes.
3Reliability
If pharmacophores are determined from multiple molecules, then comprehensive pharmacological properties are captured, but the computational complexity to find matching ligands increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts the essential pharmacological requirements from multiple reference molecules into a simplified pharmacophore model. Instead of using all details from multiple complex molecules, the system identifies and extracts key pharmacophoric features (essential structural and spatial requirements) that capture the necessary pharmacological properties. This extraction process reduces computational complexity while maintaining comprehensive pharmacological coverage.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent performs preliminary pharmacophore determination from reference molecules before the actual ligand matching process. By pre-processing the reference molecules to extract pharmacophoric features in advance, the system prepares optimized search criteria that can be efficiently applied during ligand matching. This preliminary action separates the complex analysis phase from the matching phase, reducing overall computational complexity.
4Reliability
If the chemical space is extensively explored to find molecules with better pharmacological properties, then more promising candidates are identified, but the search time increases significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality optimization by focusing the search on specific regions of chemical space that are most likely to yield improved pharmacological properties. Instead of uniformly exploring all possible chemical space, the system identifies and concentrates computational resources on promising local regions based on pharmacophore constraints and moiety optimization, achieving better pharmacological results with reduced search time.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent performs preliminary filtering and constraint application before extensive chemical space exploration. By pre-establishing pharmacophore requirements, moiety constraints, and optimization criteria, the system narrows down the effective search space in advance. This preliminary action eliminates obviously unpromising candidates early, allowing the subsequent extensive search to focus only on potentially optimal regions, thereby reducing overall search time.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
The invention relates to a method, a computer program a system, a video game system and a video game for designing a molecule for medical applications by optimization of an associated drug score (101) of the molecule, comprising the steps of: a) providing a computer-readable representation of a selected molecule (100) and a drug score (101) associated to the selected molecule (100), b) determining (201) a first moiety (110) of the selected molecule (100) and a second moiety (120) of the selected molecule (100), wherein the selected molecule (100) consists of the first moiety (110) and second moiety (120), c) determining (202) a first moiety pharmacophore (130), wherein the first moiety (110) of the selected molecule (100) fits to the first moiety pharmacophore (130), d) providing (203) a graphical user interface (150), e) displaying (204) a graphical representation of a selected part (131) of the first moiety pharmacophore (130) on the graphical user interface (150), f) determining a starting point (160) on the graphical user interface (150) in relation to the graphical representation of the selected part (131) of the first moiety pharmacophore (130), g) from the starting point (160), arranging or rearranging graphical representations of molecular building blocks (170) on the graphical user interface (150), wherein the graphical representations of the molecular building blocks (170) are interconnected and form a graphical representation of a modified first moiety of a molecule (180), h) assigning (207) the graphical representation of the modified first moiety of the molecule (180) to a modified first moiety (111) of the selected molecule (100), i) determining (208) a modified molecule (190) consisting of the modified first moiety (111) and the second moiety (120) of the selected molecule (100), j) estimating (209) the associated drug score (101) for the modified molecule (190), k) disclosing (210) the associated drug score (101) of the modified molecule (190).