Molten Iron Production via Fluidized and Packed-Bed Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for manufacturing molten iron, such as the blast furnace process and smelting reduction processes, face challenges in efficiently reducing iron ores with a wide range of grain sizes, leading to issues like uneven gas flow, scattering, and increased operational complexity in fluidized-bed reduction reactors.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the reduction of first iron ores in a fluidized-bed reactor, followed by compaction and subsequent reduction with larger second iron ores in a packed-bed reactor, then melting both in a melter-gasifier with controlled reducing gas and auxiliary fuel injection, to form molten iron, while managing gas temperatures and ventilation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fine iron ores are reduced in a fluidized-bed reduction reactor with high velocity reducing gas, then reduction efficiency is improved, but scattering and adhesion occur leading to operational instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction efficiencyVSAvoidoperational stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the velocity parameter of the reducing gas from high velocity (causing scattering) to controlled velocity (preventing scattering and adhesion). By adjusting this critical parameter, the system achieves both efficient reduction and operational stability without material loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If iron ores with wide range of grain sizes are reduced in fluidized-bed reduction reactor, then adaptability to different ore sizes is improved, but uniform fluidized layer formation becomes difficult increasing operational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceptance of wide grain size rangeVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls the velocity parameter of the reducing gas to maintain uniform fluidization across ores of varying grain sizes. By optimizing this parameter, the system can process a wide range of ore sizes while keeping operation simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If reducing gas velocity is increased to fluidize fine iron ores, then reduction of fine ores is improved, but fine iron ores are scattered outside causing material loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction of fine iron oresVSAvoidscattering loss of fine iron ores
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the reducing gas velocity parameter to a controlled level that is sufficient to fluidize and reduce fine iron ores but not so high as to cause scattering loss. This parameter optimization eliminates material loss while maintaining high reduction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of substance

If reducing gas velocity is decreased to prevent scattering, then material loss is reduced, but fluidized-bed layer collapses stopping the process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattering loss preventionVSAvoidprocess continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent identifies and controls the critical velocity parameter of the reducing gas that maintains fluidized-bed layer stability. By keeping the velocity within an optimized range, the system prevents both scattering loss and layer collapse, ensuring continuous operation without material loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach prevents scattering and adhesion in fluidized-bed reactors, increases molten iron production, reduces sludge loss, and ensures complete reduction of iron ores with improved gas flow and reduced operational complexity.

Implementation Method 1

reducing first iron ores by charging the first iron ores into a fluidized-bed reduction reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 2

reducing second iron ores together with the compacted irons by charging the second iron ores and the compacted irons into a packed-bed reduction reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 3

preparing lumped carbonaceous materials as a heating source for melting the reduced compacted irons and the second iron ores

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 4

charging the lumped carbonaceous materials into the melter-gasifier and then forming a coal packed-bed; injecting oxygen through a tuyere installed in the melter-gasifier and then manufacturing molten iron

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 5

fine iron ores are reduced to be fluidized using a reducing gas with a high velocity in the fluidized-bed reduction reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Data Source

PatentEP2054532B1Method for manufacturing molten iron
Publication Date: 2019.10.30 POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD
  • EP2054532B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2054532B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2054532B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to an apparatus for manufacturing molten irons and a method for manufacturing molten iron using the same. The method for manufacturing molten irons according to the present invention includes reducing first iron ores by charging the first iron ores into a fluidized-bed reduction reactor; manufacturing compacted irons by compacting the reduced first iron ores; reducing second iron ores together with the compacted irons by charging the second iron ores and the compacted irons into a packed-bed reduction reactor, a size of the second iron ores is greater than a size of the first iron ores; charging the reduced compacted irons and the second iron ores into a melter-gasifier connected to the packed-bed reduction reactor; preparing lumped carbonaceous materials as a heating source for melting the reduced compacted irons and the second iron ores; charging the lumped carbonaceous materials into the melter- gasifier and then forming a coal packed-bed; and injecting oxygen through a tuyere installed in the melter-gasifier and then manufacturing molten iron from the compacted irons and the second iron ores.