Molybdenum Cap and Diffusion Barrier for Silicon Electron Emitters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electron emitters with small tip diameters are susceptible to oxidation and carbon build-up under ultra-high vacuum conditions, leading to instability and reduced field emission performance, with no effective method to prevent silicon oxide formation and maintain emitter stability over the system lifetime.

Innovation Solution

A protective cap layer made of molybdenum or iridium is applied to the emitter, with a diffusion barrier such as TiN, carbon, or niobium, to prevent oxidation and carbon build-up, and pulsed electric fields are used to remove adsorbates, ensuring high electron current stability and extended emitter lifetime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a protective coating is applied to prevent oxidation and carbon build-up, then emitter stability and lifetime are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemitter stabilityVSAvoidcoating structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective coating is divided into multiple functional layers: a diffusion barrier layer (TiN, TaN, or carbon) to prevent silicon oxidation, and an outer protective layer (molybdenum or iridium) to resist carbon build-up and oxidation. This segmentation allows each layer to address specific degradation mechanisms independently, improving overall emitter stability while managing complexity through functional specialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coating system uses composite material structure combining different materials with complementary properties: TiN/TaN provides oxidation resistance at the silicon interface, while molybdenum/iridium provides superior resistance to carbon contamination and oxidation at the exposed surface. This composite approach leverages the strengths of each material to achieve comprehensive protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If the emitter operates continuously under ultra-high vacuum, then electron beam emission is maintained, but oxidation and carbon build-up deteriorate performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron beam emissionVSAvoidfield emission performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The diffusion barrier layer is applied in advance to the silicon emitter surface before the emitter begins operation. This preliminary protective action prevents oxidation and carbon build-up from occurring during continuous electron beam emission, countering the degradation mechanisms before they can compromise field emission performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The outer protective layer of molybdenum or iridium serves as a sacrificial barrier that can be periodically cleaned or replaced. This layer absorbs the brunt of carbon contamination and oxidation during continuous operation, protecting the underlying silicon emitter structure while allowing for maintenance cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If pulsed electric fields are applied to remove adsorbates, then surface cleanliness is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface cleanlinessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Pulsed electric fields are applied periodically rather than continuously to remove adsorbates from the emitter surface. This periodic cleaning action maintains surface cleanliness and field emission performance by removing accumulated contaminants at intervals, while consuming energy only during the pulse periods rather than continuously during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The protective cap layer enhances the stability and emission current of silicon emitters, allowing for higher emission currents and improved stability compared to uncoated emitters, while the pulsed field cleaning method maintains the emitter surface cleanliness and extends the emitter's operational life.

Implementation Method 1

Silicon emitters are highly susceptibility to oxidation, which converts the emitter tip to a silicon oxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

A diffusion barrier may be disposed between the emitter and the protective cap layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

Molecules from the vacuum (e.g., hydrogen, carbon monoxide, oxygen, nitrogen, and water) also can adsorb onto the cathode tip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS10714294B2Metal protective layer for electron emitters with a diffusion barrier
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 KLA CORP
  • US10714294B2 patent drawing
  • US10714294B2 patent drawing
  • US10714294B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An emitter with a diameter of 100 nm or less is used with a protective cap layer and a diffusion barrier between the emitter and the protective cap layer. The protective cap layer is disposed on the exterior surface of the emitter. The protective cap layer includes molybdenum or iridium. The emitter can generate an electron beam. The emitter can be pulsed.