Momentum Wheel Control Using Simulated Angle Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Momentum wheel devices for satellites face challenges in maintaining precise speed control and alignment due to friction, delays, and measurement inaccuracies, leading to deviations in the desired rotational position.

Innovation Solution

A control system that combines a real momentum wheel device with a simulated momentum wheel device based on an ideal physical model, allowing for precise comparison and correction of rotation angles through error signals, ensuring accurate synchronization of speed and position.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a momentum wheel device is used to stabilize a spacecraft, then the gyroscopic effect provides stabilization, but friction in the bearings and control delays cause deviations in the desired rotational position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization accuracyVSAvoidrotation angle accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simulated momentum wheel device that copies the physical characteristics and behavior of the real momentum wheel device. This simulated model allows for prediction of ideal rotation angles without friction and control delays, enabling comparison with actual performance to generate correction signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the deviation between the simulated rotation angle (ideal) and the actual rotation angle (measured) is calculated. This deviation signal is fed back to the control system to generate correction commands, continuously adjusting the momentum wheel to minimize positioning errors caused by friction and delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If friction peaks occur in the bearings, then statistical changes in friction cause disturbances in speed control, but maintaining precise speed control requires complex compensation mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemomentum wheel speed controlVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulated momentum wheel device replicates the dynamic behavior of the real system, including the effects of friction. By comparing the simulated speed (which accounts for ideal conditions) with the actual speed, the system can detect friction-induced disturbances and compensate for them through the feedback mechanism without requiring complex direct friction measurement and compensation hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces direct mechanical friction compensation mechanisms with a computational approach. Instead of using complex mechanical devices to measure and compensate for bearing friction, the system uses a simulated model and computational algorithms to predict and correct for friction effects, simplifying the physical hardware while maintaining control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If control delays and dead times are present, then the desired rotational position is not achieved precisely, but reducing control loop time requires faster processing hardware

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation angle accuracyVSAvoidcontrol loop delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The simulated momentum wheel device performs preliminary calculations of the expected rotation angle based on the torque command and system dynamics model. This allows the control system to predict where the momentum wheel should be at future time points, compensating for known control delays and dead times before they actually affect the positioning accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous feedback loop compares the predicted rotation angle from the simulated model with the actual measured rotation angle. This deviation information is used to generate real-time correction commands that compensate for delays in the control system, allowing the momentum wheel to reach the desired position more accurately despite processing time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise control of the momentum wheel, minimizing deviations and achieving high accuracy in satellite alignment by compensating for friction and measurement errors, thereby stabilizing the satellite's position effectively.

Implementation Method 1

The momentum wheel is set rotating by a drive, so that a stabilizing effect can be achieved by the gyroscopic effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscopic effect: Gyroscope

Data Source

PatentUS12187463B2Control system and control method for controlling a momentum wheel device for stabilizing a spacecraft
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 ROCKWELL COLLINS DEUTLAND
  • US12187463B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control method for controlling a momentum wheel device for stabilizing a spacecraft includes: providing the momentum wheel device as a real momentum wheel device having a momentum wheel driven by a motor; providing a simulated momentum wheel device based on an ideal physical model; concurrent feeding of a torque command to both momentum wheel devices, to change a rotational speed of both momentum wheel devices; controlling the motor to change the rotational speed dependent on the fed torque command; detecting a real rotation angle of the real momentum wheel device; calculating a simulated rotation angle of the simulated momentum wheel device by two-fold integration of the fed torque command; comparing the real rotation angle and the simulated rotation angle and generating an error signal corresponding to a deviation between the real and simulated rotation angles; and controlling the motor due to the error signal to reduce the deviation.