Monitoring Apparatus Command Compatibility Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

When an external device connected to a monitoring apparatus is replaced with a device of a different product, the new device may not support the existing commands, leading to a state where the pre-set rules cannot be followed, especially since such replacements are often performed by non-experts who fail to reset the rules appropriately.

Innovation Solution

The monitoring apparatus includes a storage unit to associate node numbers with commands, a determination unit to check if the new device supports these commands, and a control unit to change the commands if necessary, ensuring seamless operation by prompting users to update the rules when compatibility issues arise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If an external device is replaced with a different product, then device replacement is achieved, but command compatibility is lost causing rules to fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice replacementVSAvoidrule execution
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by storing command information in advance for multiple external devices. When a device is replaced, the monitoring apparatus already has command data available to quickly determine compatibility and switch to an alternative device's commands, preventing rule execution failure without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes feedback by checking command compatibility between the new external device and the rules after replacement. The determination unit verifies whether the new device supports required commands, and if not, the system retrieves alternative command information from previously registered devices to restore rule functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If command compatibility is strictly checked, then rule execution accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverule execution accuracyVSAvoidcommand compatibility checking
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Command information is stored in advance for multiple external devices before replacement occurs. This preliminary preparation includes capturing device type, node number, and supported commands, which eliminates the need for complex real-time compatibility analysis and simplifies the replacement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by retrieving and reusing command information from previously registered external devices that have similar functions. Instead of implementing complex compatibility verification algorithms, the system copies command data from alternative devices that support the required rules, maintaining accuracy while reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If manual rule resetting is required after device replacement, then command compatibility can be verified, but operational time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand compatibilityVSAvoidrule reset time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring apparatus performs self-service by automatically detecting device replacement, checking command compatibility, and switching to alternative command information without human intervention. The system monitors device status changes and autonomously executes the compatibility verification and rule restoration process, eliminating manual rule resetting entirely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Command information from multiple external devices is registered in advance, creating a ready-to-use repository of alternative commands. When replacement occurs, the system immediately queries this pre-prepared information rather than performing time-consuming manual configuration, drastically reducing operational time while ensuring compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11716245B2Information processing apparatus for preventing a state where operation following a rule set in the information processing apparatus is not performed
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 CANON KK
  • US11716245B2 patent drawing
  • US11716245B2 patent drawing
  • US11716245B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a storage unit configured to store setting that associates a node number assigned to a first external device with a first command transmittable and receivable to/from the first external device, a determination unit configured to determine, in a case where the first command is not transmittable and receivable to/from a second external device that takes over the node number of the first external device, whether a second command compatible with the first command is transmittable and receivable to/from the second external device, and a control unit configured to perform, in a case where the determination unit determines that the second command is transmittable and receivable to/from the second external device, control to change the first command in the setting to the second command.