Monitoring Field Device Layout for Segmented Spark Shutdown

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In automation systems with components in potentially explosive areas, existing systems face challenges in efficiently supplying electrical energy while ensuring explosion protection, particularly due to limitations in power transfer caused by wiring lengths and capacitive/inductive effects, which restrict the application of intrinsically safe systems.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a feed device and multiple field devices, where the feed device monitors for sparks and switches off the energy supply, and at least one field device acts as a monitoring field device to detect sparks and terminate the energy supply with low latency, allowing for segmented monitoring to overcome distance-related restrictions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single centralized monitoring system is used to detect sparks and shut down power supply, then the system structure is simple, but the maximum transmittable electrical power is limited due to cable length and response time delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidmaximum transmittable electrical power
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monitoring system into multiple distributed monitoring field devices along the cable network. Each monitoring field device independently monitors its local segment for sparks and can autonomously shut down power supply to that segment. This segmentation eliminates the power limitations imposed by centralized monitoring response times and cable length constraints, as each distributed monitor operates independently with shorter effective monitoring distances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Length of stationary object

If cable length is increased to cover larger areas, then the system coverage is improved, but the response time increases and maximum transmittable power decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecable lengthVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements distributed monitoring where multiple monitoring field devices are placed at different locations along the cable route. Each device monitors a local segment, reducing the effective response distance. When a spark is detected, only the local segment is rapidly shut down, achieving fast response time while maintaining long overall cable length for extended coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Power

If distributed monitoring field devices are deployed to overcome cable length limitations, then the transmittable electrical power and system coverage are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmittable electrical powerVSAvoidmonitoring system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring field devices are designed as universal units that can be deployed at multiple locations along the cable network. Each device performs the same functions: monitoring for sparks, detecting faults, and shutting down local power supply. This multi-functionality allows the system to achieve distributed monitoring capability without proportionally increasing overall complexity, as identical standardized devices are used throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If centralized spark detection and shutdown is implemented, then the system is easy to control, but the system response time is slow due to detection and shutdown delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem controlVSAvoiddetection and shutdown delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent distributes monitoring and control functions to multiple autonomous monitoring field devices located throughout the system. Each device independently detects sparks in its local segment and immediately shuts down power supply to that segment without waiting for centralized processing. This eliminates detection and shutdown delays associated with centralized control, as each local monitor acts autonomously and instantaneously upon detecting a spark.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4292182B1System and monitoring field device
Publication Date: 2024.05.29 BECKHOFF AUTOMATION GMBH
  • EP4292182B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4292182B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4292182B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a system comprising a feed-in device and a plurality of field devices electrically connected to the feed-in device. The feed-in device is designed to provide electrical energy for an electrical energy supply to the field devices. The feed-in device has a feed-in device monitoring unit which is designed to detect spark production in the electrical energy supply and, on the basis thereof, to disconnect the electrical energy supply. The field devices have in each case an input connection for connecting a supply line. At least one field device has a connection device for connecting at least one output line. At least one field device is a monitoring field device which is designed for the electrical energy supply of at least one field device arranged downstream thereof and for monitoring. The monitoring field device has at least one output connection for connecting an additional supply line, by which the electrical energy of at least one field device arranged downstream thereof can be forwarded for electric energy supply. The feed-in device has a monitoring device which is designed to detect spark production in the electrical energy supply and, on the basis thereof, to disconnect the electrical energy supply. The invention further relates to a monitoring field device for a system.