Monoblock Opposed Piston Engine Port Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing internal combustion engines face challenges in achieving optimal fuel efficiency and power production, as they often require complex valve systems, multiple crankshafts, and inefficient energy transfer, leading to reduced performance and increased mechanical complexity.

Innovation Solution

A five-stroke internal combustion engine design featuring opposed piston pairs in a monoblock configuration, where each cylinder completes a full cycle per crankshaft rotation, eliminating the need for traditional valves and using pistons to control intake and exhaust ports, and connecting crankshafts via gears or connecting bars to optimize energy transfer and combustion efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional valve systems and multiple crankshafts are used, then engine operation can be maintained, but mechanical complexity increases and fuel efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical complexityVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the valve system from the engine design, eliminating intake and exhaust valves that are traditionally used to control fuel and exhaust flow. Instead, the piston itself performs the valving function by positioning ports open or closed during its stroke, thereby reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining engine operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The piston is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as both a moving component that converts combustion energy to mechanical work and as a valving mechanism that controls fuel intake and exhaust release. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate valve components, reducing overall device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Power

If traditional four-stroke cycle is used, then engine operation is stable, but power production per rotation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower productionVSAvoidtime per cycle
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The engine operates on a five-stroke cycle that repeats periodically, with each stroke representing a distinct phase of operation (intake, compression, power, exhaust, and a additional stroke for optimized timing). This periodic five-stroke action allows for more frequent power deliveries compared to the traditional four-stroke cycle, increasing power production without requiring additional time per cycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The five-stroke cycle design ensures that useful work is performed more continuously by optimizing the timing and duration of each stroke. The additional stroke enables better overlap and transition between operations, reducing idle time and maintaining continuous productive action throughout the rotation cycle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Use of energy by moving object

If opposed piston pairs are used, then fuel efficiency improves, but control of port timing becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidport control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The opposed piston pairs automatically control port timing through their own motion. As the pistons move up and down the cylinder, they inherently open and close the intake and exhaust ports at the appropriate moments without requiring external control mechanisms. The piston position itself determines port status, making the system self-regulating and improving fuel efficiency while avoiding additional complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances fuel efficiency and power production by allowing precise control of fuel intake and exhaust, reducing mechanical complexity, and increasing the useful work done per crankshaft rotation, resulting in improved performance and longer engine life.

Implementation Method 1

combustion chamber for burning, exploding, igniting, etc. fuel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

single explosion in the chamber to drive both pistons in opposite directions simultaneously

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExplosion: Explosion

Implementation Method 3

compression; explosion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP2225446B1Monoblock valveless opposing piston internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2020.06.17 TWO HEADS
  • EP2225446B1 patent drawingFigure 1(A)~1(B)
  • EP2225446B1 patent drawingFigure 2(A)~2(C)
  • EP2225446B1 patent drawingFigure 2(D)~2(F)

AI summary

The present invention provides an internal combustion engine that provides advantages of both typical 2-stroke engines and typical 4-stroke engines, but using a new design unlike either. The present engine provides for use of pistons as means for opening and closing intake and exhaust ports disposed on cylinder walls. It also provides two pistons per cylinder in an opposing configuration, such that one fuel explosion event causes motion of both pistons per cylinder, in opposite directions. Each piston of a cylinder is connected to a separate crankshaft, which completes a single revolution about its axis per fuel explosion event in a cylinder. In a single cycle of piston movement along the cylinder, a full cycle of ignition, exhaust, intake, and compression is achieved.