Modular monocoque backrest

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional aircraft passenger seat backrests are heavy and costly due to the use of metallic materials, which do not efficiently distribute stress loads and require additional reinforcement for crash and torsional loads.

Innovation Solution

A modular monocoque backrest structure made from carbon fiber composite materials, incorporating a honeycomb structure and foam core for stress distribution, and integrated design features such as a restraint system and lumbar support, eliminating the need for external metallic components and additional hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If heavy metallic materials are used in the backrest structure, then structural strength and load-bearing capacity are improved, but weight and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidbackrest weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) with aluminum spars and honeycomb structures. The CFRP monocoque shell provides high strength-to-weight ratio, while the aluminum spars and honeycomb core provide additional structural support and energy absorption during crashes, achieving both weight reduction and maintained structural strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameters from traditional heavy metals to lightweight composites with optimized mechanical properties. The CFRP material provides equivalent or superior strength to aluminum while reducing weight, and the modular design allows parameter optimization for different crash load scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If additional metallic reinforcement components are added to endure crash and torsional loads, then structural reliability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash load resistanceVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple structural functions into integrated components. The aluminum spars are embedded within the CFRP monocoque structure, combining the shell and reinforcement into a unified load-bearing system. The honeycomb structure serves multiple functions: structural support, energy absorption, and weight reduction, eliminating the need for separate reinforcement components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite construction of CFRP monocoque with aluminum spar reinforcement creates a multi-material structure that achieves superior crash resistance through material synergy rather than through adding multiple separate metallic reinforcement components, thereby reducing overall structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If traditional metallic frame structures with multiple components are used, then load-bearing capacity is improved, but manufacturing cost and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the backrest into modular components: the CFRP monocoque shell, aluminum spars, honeycomb core, and integrated restraint system. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured and tested separately, then assembled into the final structure, reducing overall manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining load-bearing capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The use of composite materials enables more efficient load distribution throughout the structure, allowing for optimized material placement and reduced overall material usage compared to traditional all-metallic constructions, thereby reducing manufacturing cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3219616B1Modular monocoque backrest
Publication Date: 2020.05.13 AMI IND INC
  • EP3219616B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3219616B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3219616B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

A modular monocoque backrest (100) is provided. The modular monocoque backrest (100) comprises a front shroud (110), a back shroud (120), and an at least one back spar (130). The front shroud (110) is coupled to the back shroud (120), and the back spar (130) is configured as a mounting point, enabling the modular monocoque backrest (100) to mount to an aircraft floor. The front shroud (110) and the back shroud (120) may comprise a carbon fiber composite material, allowing the modular monocoque backrest (100) to be modular in nature. The carbon fiber composite material may enable the modular monocoque backrest (100) to have a lightweight design while also maintaining resistance to dynamic crash loads.