Monocoque Military Vehicle Structure for Blast-Resistant Lifting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional military vehicles rely on conventional frame rails for lifting, which require sequential assembly of components and can transfer blast forces directly to the vehicle's floor, leading to potential damage and reduced strength-to-weight performance.

Innovation Solution

The military vehicle design incorporates a structural shell and subframes that replace conventional frame rails, featuring a monocoque construction with integrated armor mounting points, breakaway sections, and a lift structure that allows for elevated transport without traditional frame rails, enhancing strength-to-weight performance and blast resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional frame rails are used for lifting, then the vehicle can be transported by securing lifting slings to the frame rails, but the frame rails transfer blast forces directly to the vehicle's floor causing potential damage and reduced strength-to-weight performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelifting capabilityVSAvoidblast force transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle structure is divided into separate functional components: a monocoque passenger compartment and a separate frame assembly with crossmembers. The frame rails are eliminated and replaced with a modular frame structure that can be detached, allowing the passenger compartment to be lifted and transported independently from the powertrain and heavy components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The conventional frame rails that directly connected the passenger compartment to the powertrain are completely removed. Instead, a separate frame assembly with crossmembers supports the powertrain, while the monocoque passenger compartment has its own integrated structure with mounting points for lifting slings, extracting the harmful blast force transmission path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional frame rails are used, then components can be coupled to the frame rails, but sequential assembly is required increasing manufacturing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent assemblyVSAvoidassembly sequence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle is segmented into independently manufacturable modules: the monocoque passenger compartment can be assembled and tested separately, the frame assembly with crossmembers can be prepared separately, and the powertrain can be installed last. This modular segmentation eliminates the need for sequential assembly required by conventional frame rail structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monocoque passenger compartment structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides passenger protection, structural support, and integrated mounting points for both the frame assembly and lifting slings. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components and simplifies the overall assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If traditional frame rails are used, then the vehicle structure is simple, but the strength-to-weight performance is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidstrength-to-weight ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The monocoque passenger compartment utilizes composite material construction combining steel and aluminum alloys, providing high strength-to-weight ratio. The integrated armor mounting points and structural shell are designed to optimize the distribution of structural materials, reducing overall vehicle weight while maintaining or enhancing structural strength compared to conventional frame rail designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves the vehicle's strength-to-weight performance, reduces blast force on occupants, and allows for efficient lifting and transport while minimizing the risk of frame rail impact during operations.

Implementation Method 1

The air-to-hydraulic intensifier is coupled to the brake housing. The air-to-hydraulic intensifier is configured to receive a supply of air and provide a hydraulic fluid to the brake housing based on the supply of air to overcome the brake biasing force to disengage the rod from the brake to permit movement of the one of the plurality of tractive elements.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir-to-hydraulic intensifier: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

The resilient member is positioned within the inner volume and configured to generate a brake biasing force against the piston such that the rod is biased into engagement with the brake.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResilient member: Spring

Implementation Method 3

The brake is configured to facilitate braking one of the plurality of tractive elements.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11878669B2Military vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.01.23 OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC
  • US11878669B2 patent drawing
  • US11878669B2 patent drawing
  • US11878669B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A military vehicle includes a front axle, a rear axle, a front differential coupled to the front axle, and a transaxle coupled to the rear axle and the front differential. The transaxle includes an internal mechanical disconnect that facilitates mechanically decoupling the transaxle from the front differential.