Monolithic Armwing Structures for Collision-Tolerant Aerial Robots

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aerial robots with rotary or fixed-wing features are not collision-tolerant and lack the aerodynamic efficiency of biological flight systems, posing safety risks and failing to replicate the dynamic versatility of bat wing conformations.

Innovation Solution

A bio-inspired monolithic armwing structure for aerial robots, composed of rigid and flexible materials, uses flexible living hinges and a drive mechanism actuated by a motor to mimic bat wing articulations, allowing expansion and retraction during flapping motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid body structures are used in aerial robots, then structural strength is improved, but collision tolerance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidcollision tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies flexible materials to the rotor blades and propellers, replacing traditional rigid structures with compliant, flexible components that can deform during collisions. This flexibility allows the structure to absorb impact forces through deformation rather than fracturing, thereby maintaining collision tolerance while preserving sufficient structural strength for operational integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Reliability

If extremely flexible materials are used for rotor blades, then collision tolerance is improved, but aerodynamic efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision toleranceVSAvoidaerodynamic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs materials with intermediate flexibility parameters—not extremely flexible nor rigid—allowing the rotor blades to maintain adequate aerodynamic performance while possessing sufficient compliance for collision tolerance. The material properties are carefully selected and tuned to balance aerodynamic efficiency with impact resistance, achieving an optimal compromise between the two conflicting requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If fixed-wing or rotary-wing systems are used, then aerial mobility is improved, but safety in residential spaces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerial mobilityVSAvoidsafety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces rigid fixed-wing or rotary-wing structures with flexible, compliant components that can deform during collisions with humans or objects in residential spaces. This flexibility significantly reduces the harmful impact forces, making the aerial robot safe for operation in human-populated environments while preserving aerial mobility capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Adaptability or versatility

If morphing body designs are implemented, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemorphing capabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements morphing capabilities through dynamic, flexible structures that can change their configuration during flight operations. The rotor blades and propellers are designed with inherent flexibility that allows them to adapt their shape and stiffness characteristics in response to operational conditions, providing morphing functionality without requiring complex mechanical actuation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structure achieves a compact, lightweight design capable of mimicking the speed and flexibility of natural bat wings, enhancing collision tolerance and aerodynamic efficiency, enabling safe operation in residential spaces.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of rigid members connected together by flexible living hinges

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A motor is connected to the drive mechanism for actuating the drive mechanism to move the armwing structures through a series of wingbeats

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

the armwing structures expand in a downstroke and retract in an upstroke to move the wing membranes in a flapping motion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Data Source

PatentUS12404021B2Armwing structures for aerial robots
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 NORTHEASTERN UNIV (US)
  • US12404021B2 patent drawing
  • US12404021B2 patent drawing
  • US12404021B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Robotic wings for an aerial drone include a plurality of armwing structures, each comprising a plurality of rigid members connected together by flexible living hinges in a single monolithic structure. Wing membranes are supported by the armwing structures. A drive mechanism is connected to the armwing structures for articulating the armwing structures. A motor is connected to the drive mechanism for actuating the drive mechanism to move the armwing structures through a series of wingbeats wherein the armwing structures expand in a downstroke and retract in an upstroke to move the wing membranes in a flapping motion.