Monolithic Beam With Varying Flange Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Standard steel beams used in composite beams lack sufficient strength and efficiency in supporting concrete loads, necessitating improvements in structural integrity and load-bearing capacity.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic beam system with a characteristic cross-sectional shape matching standard steel beams, featuring integrated flanges and a transverse section of varying thicknesses, which are manufactured as a single piece without post-manufacturing welds, allowing for direct replacement of standard beams while enhancing strength and stiffness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If standard steel beams are used in composite beams, then the structure can be constructed with conventional materials and methods, but the strength and load-bearing capacity are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidload-bearing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The monolithic beam features varying thickness throughout its structure, with thicker sections strategically positioned at locations experiencing higher stress concentrations. This non-uniform thickness distribution optimizes the beam's strength-to-weight ratio by concentrating material where it is most needed, thereby improving both strength and load-bearing capacity without uniformly increasing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite structure by integrating the monolithic beam with concrete and shear studs, forming a composite beam system. This combination leverages the high tensile strength of steel in the monolithic beam and the compressive strength of concrete, resulting in a structure with superior load-bearing capacity compared to conventional steel beams alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If the monolithic beam uses varying thickness in flanges and transverse section, then the strength is improved, but the manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the flanges and transverse section into a single monolithic component that is manufactured as one integrated piece. Although the geometry is complex with varying thicknesses, the unified design eliminates the need for separate manufacturing and assembly of multiple parts, reducing overall manufacturing complexity despite the sophisticated shape requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the monolithic beam is manufactured as a single piece without welds, then the structural integrity is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the welding process entirely from the manufacturing sequence by designing the beam to be produced as a monolithic piece. This elimination of welding not only improves structural integrity by removing potential weak points and sources of defects but also shifts the precision requirements to the casting or forming process, which can be controlled more consistently in a single manufacturing operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Weight of stationary object

If the monolithic beam has the same weight per unit length as standard beams, then the cost and material usage are reduced, but the strength improvement must be achieved through design optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight per unit lengthVSAvoidstrength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The monolithic beam achieves superior strength at the same weight by implementing local quality variations through non-uniform thickness distribution. Material is concentrated in regions of high stress and reduced in regions of low stress, optimizing the structural efficiency. This allows the beam to carry higher loads without increasing weight, as the improved strength comes from strategic material placement rather than uniform thickening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10179999B2Structural system and method using monolithic beams having improved strength
Publication Date: 2019.01.15 SHUHAIBAR CONSTANTINE
  • US10179999B2 patent drawing
  • US10179999B2 patent drawing
  • US10179999B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments include a structural system for replacing a standard beam. The standard beam has a weight per unit length, a depth in a load direction, a characteristic cross-sectional shape and a width in a cross direction substantially perpendicular to the load direction. The structural system includes a monolithic beam having the characteristic cross-sectional shape and the depth in the load direction. The monolithic beam may also have the weight per unit length. The monolithic beam includes first and second flanges connected by a transverse section. The first and second flanges extend in the cross direction and have first and second thicknesses, respectively, in the load direction. The flanges are not wider than the width in the cross direction. At least one of the flanges has the width in the cross direction. The thicknesses are different. The flanges and the transverse section are an integrated structure forming the monolithic beam.