Monolithic Vehicle Bumper Impact Absorber Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle bumper designs often concentrate stress at connecting sites when transmitting impact loads to impact absorbing portions, leading to potential fractures and reduced collision safety performance.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle bumper design where the impact absorbing portion and bumper reinforcement are formed in one piece, eliminating the need for intermediate connecting members and incorporating widened portions and varying thicknesses to distribute and absorb impact loads effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If intermediate connecting members are used to connect the impact absorbing portion to the bumper reinforcement, then the structural complexity increases and assembly becomes more difficult, but stress concentration at connecting sites may occur leading to potential fractures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision safetyVSAvoidnumber of connecting sites
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impact absorbing portion and bumper reinforcement are integrated into a single monolithic structure formed from one piece, eliminating intermediate connecting members and their associated connecting sites. This merging removes the sources of stress concentration and potential fracture while maintaining both structural functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Within the monolithic structure, the impact absorbing portion is designed with segmented features including hollow sections and multiple wall thicknesses. These internal segmentations create stress distribution paths that absorb impact energy while preventing stress concentration at any single point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of energy

If the impact absorbing portion is made less rigid than the bumper reinforcement, then impact energy can be absorbed more effectively, but the load transmission efficiency may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact energy absorptionVSAvoidload transmission efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The impact absorbing portion features non-uniform wall thickness with thicker sections at critical load transmission points and thinner sections in energy-absorbing zones. This local quality variation enables the structure to transmit impact loads efficiently through thick-walled regions while absorbing energy through deformation in thin-walled regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The structure utilizes variable geometric parameters including changing wall thickness, hollow sections, and varying cross-sectional areas along the impact absorbing portion. These parameter changes create a gradient of rigidity that optimizes both load transmission and energy absorption characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10059290B2Vehicle bumper
Publication Date: 2018.08.28 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US10059290B2 patent drawing
  • US10059290B2 patent drawing
  • US10059290B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An impact absorbing portion and a bumper reinforcement are formed in one piece, so an intermediate member for connecting the impact absorbing portion to the bumper reinforcement is no longer necessary. Therefore, the generation of stress concentration is able to be inhibited. As a result, load transmission efficiency with which a load is transmitted from the bumper reinforcement to the impact absorbing portion is able to be improved.