Monolithic Column Joint Retaining Rings Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing column cover assembly process is slow and expensive due to misalignment issues during installation, as traditional column joints are constructed from multiple pieces that are difficult to assemble correctly.

Innovation Solution

A column cover system featuring monolithic column joint portions with upper and lower retaining rings and projections, along with a tensioning bracket to ensure proper alignment and secure seating of column skins, facilitating easier and more precise installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional multi-piece column joints are used, then the assembly process is complex and time-consuming, but the structural integrity is maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidjoint assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate joint pieces into a single monolithic column joint that integrates the upper retaining ring, lower retaining ring, and connecting structures into one unified component. This merging eliminates the need for assembling multiple pieces, thereby increasing assembly speed while maintaining structural integrity through the unified design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The monolithic joint is designed with integrated segmentation features including upper and lower retaining rings with protrusions that create revealing gaps between column skins. These segmented features are built into the single piece, allowing the joint to maintain complex functional segmentation without requiring multiple separate components, thus improving assembly efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of time

If traditional column joints are used, then installation time increases due to misalignment, but flexibility in installation methods is preserved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation timeVSAvoidinstallation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The monolithic column joint is pre-configured with upper and lower retaining rings positioned at precise locations, along with protrusions that extend into revealing gaps. This preliminary positioning of all critical features during manufacturing eliminates the need for alignment adjustments during installation, reducing installation time while maintaining ease of operation through the pre-established geometric relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining rings with integrated protrusions are designed to automatically guide and align column skins during installation. The protrusions extend into the revealing gaps created between adjacent column skins, enabling the joint to self-align and secure the skins without requiring external alignment tools or complex installation procedures, thus reducing installation time while preserving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If monolithic column joint portions are used, then assembly speed increases, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidjoint manufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The monolithic joint design utilizes parameter optimization in the form of standardized protrusion dimensions, retaining ring positions, and revealing gap measurements. By establishing consistent dimensional parameters for these features, the complex monolithic structure can be manufactured using conventional precision machining or extrusion processes, thereby increasing assembly speed while keeping manufacturing complexity manageable through parameter standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If retaining projections extend toward the reveal, then alignment precision improves, but structural strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolumn skin alignment precisionVSAvoidjoint structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining projections are designed with local quality differentiation where the protrusions extend into the revealing gaps to provide precise alignment features, while the main body of the monolithic joint maintains continuous material structure for structural strength. The projections are localized features that do not compromise the overall structural integrity, as they are integrated into the monolithic design rather than being separate fastening elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10640987B2Column cover reveal
Publication Date: 2020.05.05 FRY REGLET CORP
  • US10640987B2 patent drawing
  • US10640987B2 patent drawing
  • US10640987B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A column cover system includes a first column skin, a second column skin, and a column joint vertically connecting the first column skin and the second column skin. The column joint includes at least one monolithic column joint portion that defines an upper retaining ring and a lower retaining ring. When assembled, the first column skin is seated within the upper retaining ring and the second column skin is seated within the lower retaining ring.