Monolithic Composite Part Densification via Pre-densified Stitching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing thermostructural monolithic fibres/matrix composite parts struggle to effectively interconnect composite material skins with thread-like spacers that can withstand high internal and external pressures without damaging the stitching threads during densification.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming a fibrous preform with a flexible core and outer frames joined by stitching threads, followed by pre-densification using CVI gas-phase infiltration to create a carbon layer, and then densifying with liquid-phase infiltration to form a C-C/SiC structure, allowing for controlled densification and protection of the stitching threads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If liquid-phase infiltration is used for densification, then densification is easy to control and cost is reduced, but the stitching threads may be damaged during the densification process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensification controlVSAvoidstitching thread integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing CVI gas-phase infiltration before liquid-phase infiltration to pre-densify the preform and create a protective carbon layer on the stitching threads. This preliminary carbonization protects the organic stitching threads from damage during the subsequent liquid-phase silicon infiltration process, while still allowing controlled densification to proceed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If CVI gas-phase infiltration is used for pre-densification, then the stitching threads are protected and densification is controlled, but the production time and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestitching thread protectionVSAvoidproduction cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using R-CVI (Rapid Chemical Vapour Infiltration) instead of conventional CVI, which significantly reduces the infiltration time while achieving the same pre-densification effect. This rapid infiltration process maintains the protective carbon layer formation on stitching threads but completes the process much faster, reducing overall production cycle time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If the core is removed after curing, then the sandwich structure is simplified, but the thread-like spacers may not be properly formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesandwich structureVSAvoidspacer formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by removing the flexible core from the sandwich structure before the densification process. This timing is critical because it allows the longitudinal channels that formed during stitching to be opened up, enabling proper resin impregnation and subsequent formation of thread-like spacers during densification. The core removal before densification ensures that the spacers form correctly without the core obstructing the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a rigid monolithic composite part with improved cost-effectiveness and performance, enabling the production of parts that can withstand extreme temperatures and pressures, while maintaining the structural integrity of the stitching threads.

Implementation Method 1

densifying the resulting structure by liquid-phase infiltration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-phase infiltration: Permeation

Implementation Method 2

pre-densification is carried out in step B/ by CVI gas-phase infiltration (chemical vapour infiltration)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapour infiltration: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS10759713B2Method for producing a double-walled thermostructural monolithic composite part, and part produced
Publication Date: 2020.09.01 MBDA FRANCE
  • US10759713B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fibrous preform (1) is produced, provided with a sandwich structure comprising an intermediate flexible core (4) and two outer fibrous frames (2, 3), respectively arranged on opposing outer faces of said flexible core (4) and assembled by sections of wire (8, 9) passing through said fibrous frames (2, 3), said preform (1) being impregnated with resin. Said preform is then hardened and the core (4) is removed, preferably by pre-densification with chemical vapour infiltration, and the structure produced is then densified with liquid-phase infiltration.