Monolithic Composite Under-Wing Pylon Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing under-wing pylons made of both metal and composite materials face implementation challenges due to structural complexity and the need for substantial load transport within aerodynamic and dimensional constraints.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic under-wing pylon made from a stratified framework of carbon fibers, either unidirectional or woven, impregnated with epoxy resin, providing increased rigidity and reduced weight through a single, integrated composite structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If under-wing pylons are made of assembled metal and composite material parts, then structural capacity to transport substantial loads can be achieved, but the device complexity increases and manufacturing becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural capacityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate parts (metal elements and composite material elements) into a single monolithic structure made entirely of composite material. This integration eliminates the need for assembly between different material types, reducing device complexity while maintaining the structural capacity to transport substantial loads through the unified composite framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials (specifically fibreglass or similar composite materials) to replace the previous combination of metal and composite parts. This allows the creation of a monolithic structure that achieves the required structural capacity while simplifying manufacturing, as the entire pylon can be formed through composite layup and curing processes rather than assembling multiple parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If under-wing pylons use assembled metal and composite material parts, then structural capacity for substantial loads can be achieved, but manufacturing precision and implementation reliability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural capacityVSAvoidassembly precision
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By combining all structural elements into a single monolithic composite structure, the patent eliminates the need for precise assembly operations between metal and composite parts. The manufacturing precision requirement shifts to the composite layup and curing process, which can achieve high precision through controlled manufacturing methods, thereby improving overall implementation reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If under-wing pylons are made of assembled metal and composite material parts, then structural capacity to transport substantial loads can be achieved, but the weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural capacityVSAvoidpylon weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials (fibreglass or similar composites) to replace metal elements in the pylon structure. Composite materials typically have higher strength-to-weight ratios compared to metals, allowing the monolithic structure to achieve the required structural capacity for transporting substantial loads while significantly reducing the overall weight of the pylon.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If under-wing pylons use assembled metal and composite material parts, then structural capacity can be achieved, but the ease of manufacture decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural capacityVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By merging all parts into a single monolithic composite structure, the patent simplifies the manufacturing process. Instead of manufacturing separate metal and composite parts and then assembling them with precise alignment and fastening operations, the entire pylon can be manufactured in one continuous composite layup and curing process, significantly improving ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances structural rigidity while reducing weight, facilitating the transport of substantial loads while adhering to aerodynamic and dimensional requirements.

Implementation Method 1

a monolithic framework made through a stratification of carbon fibres, unidirectional and/or woven, impregnated with epoxy resin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComposite materials: Composite Materials

Data Source

PatentUS8800929B2Under-wing pylon made of composite material
Publication Date: 2014.08.12 ALENIA AERMACCHI
  • US8800929B2 patent drawing
  • US8800929B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Under-wing pylon for an aircraft which has on the upper side a pin (2) for attaching to the fuselage or to the wings of the aircraft itself, and a connector (3) for connecting the pylon to the aircraft. The pylon has a monolithic framework made with stratified unidirectional and/or woven carbon fibres, impregnated with epoxy resin.