Monolithic Flexure Mount for Thermal Stress Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional optical system mounting techniques face challenges in maintaining precision due to thermal expansion and contraction differences between materials, leading to warping or positional changes of precision surfaces, especially in extreme temperature environments like outer space.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic flexure mount system with radial, goniometric, and main flexures that absorb stress, allowing for expansion and contraction while keeping the center of expansion stationary, using a cylindrical profile with injection tunnels for adhesive bonding and a compact design suitable for precision surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional multi-part apparatuses are used to absorb thermal stresses, then stress absorption capability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress absorption capabilityVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate stress-absorbing components into a single monolithic flexure mount structure. The flexure mount integrates radial flexures, goniometric flexures, and main flexures into one unified monolithic component, eliminating the need for multiple separate parts while maintaining stress absorption capability. This resolves the contradiction by combining multiple functions into a single structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The monolithic flexure mount is segmented into distinct functional regions: radial flexures for radial movement, goniometric flexures for rotational adjustment, and main flexures for primary stress absorption. These segmented regions work together within a single monolithic structure, providing complex stress absorption capabilities without requiring multiple separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If conventional multi-part apparatuses are used to interface precision surfaces, then stress absorption is improved, but manufacturing cost and bulk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress absorptionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By combining multiple stress-absorbing functions into a single monolithic flexure mount, the patent reduces the number of parts that need to be manufactured, assembled, and inventoried. This monolithic structure can be manufactured as one piece using additive manufacturing or other suitable processes, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining robust stress absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If conventional apparatuses are simplified to reduce size, then device complexity is reduced, but robustness under thermal stress is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus complexityVSAvoidrobustness under thermal stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The flexure mount utilizes flexible flexure elements (radial flexures, goniometric flexures, and main flexures) that are integrated into a compact monolithic structure. These flexible elements provide the necessary compliance to absorb thermal stresses while maintaining a compact size, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Device complexity

If monolithic flexure mounts are used to reduce complexity, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs additive manufacturing (3D printing) technology to manufacture the monolithic flexure mount, which allows for complex geometries and precise dimensional control that would be difficult or impossible to achieve with traditional machining. This manufacturing approach reduces the practical precision requirements compared to conventional machining methods while enabling the monolithic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The flexure mount system effectively reduces stress and maintains the lateral position of precision surfaces by allowing expansion and contraction, ensuring robustness and precision even under significant thermal variations, while being cost-effective and lightweight for use in space telescopes.

Implementation Method 1

the flexure mounts absorb stress caused by, for example, expansion or contraction of the precision surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The goniometric flexures allow for a relatively small amount of rotation about the pivot point while preventing tangential displacement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Hinge

Data Source

PatentUS10409030B1Monolithic flexure mount
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US10409030B1 patent drawing
  • US10409030B1 patent drawing
  • US10409030B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A flexure mount is described herein. The flexure mount includes three different flexures laterally offset from one another along a length of the flexure mount. The flexured design of the flexure mount allows for compliance in certain directions to reduce stress buildup normally associated with rigid mounting of dissimilar materials under dynamic thermal environments.