Monolithic Gate Valve Seat Assembly for High-Pressure Leak Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gate valves experience leaks and require frequent maintenance due to multiple leak paths and complex sealing mechanisms, which are prone to failure under high pressure conditions, leading to operational inefficiencies and increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A gate valve assembly with a single seat configuration that eliminates the need for a seat retainer and seat insert, utilizing a monolithic seat that directly interfaces with the valve body and incorporates spring-energized seal assemblies to provide a dynamic seal, reducing leak paths and enhancing sealing efficiency at both high and low pressures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional gate valves use multiple seal rings and complex sealing mechanisms to prevent leaks, then sealing capability is improved, but device complexity increases and reliability decreases due to more potential failure points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing reliabilityVSAvoidsealing mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the seat retainer component entirely from the conventional gate valve design. By extracting this intermediate component, the invention simplifies the sealing mechanism while maintaining sealing effectiveness through direct engagement between the gate and seat assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the gate and seat assembly into a more integrated configuration where the gate directly interfaces with the seat. This merging eliminates the need for separate seat retainers and multiple seal rings, reducing the number of potential failure points while maintaining sealing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If conventional gate valves use multiple seal rings to bridge gaps at high pressure, then sealing capability is improved, but maintenance requirements increase due to more components that can fail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleak preventionVSAvoidmaintenance frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the seat retainer component, reducing the total number of parts that require maintenance. This simplification directly reduces maintenance frequency while maintaining leak prevention through the streamlined sealing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The spring-energized seal assembly provides automatic sealing action that maintains effectiveness without requiring frequent manual intervention or adjustment, reducing maintenance needs while ensuring continuous leak prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If conventional gate valves use complex sealing mechanisms with multiple components, then sealing capability under high pressure is improved, but the number of leak paths increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoidnumber of leak paths
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the seat retainer and reducing the number of intermediate sealing components, the patent eliminates potential leak paths that would exist at each interface. The streamlined design maintains sealing effectiveness through direct gate-to-seat contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the sealing function into distinct zones: the primary seal between the gate and seat, and the secondary seal between the seat and valve body. This segmentation clarifies the sealing paths and reduces the number of potential leak points compared to conventional multi-component designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If conventional gate valves use multiple seal rings and retainers, then sealing capability is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the seat retainer component, simplifying the manufacturing process by reducing the number of parts to manufacture, assemble, and quality-check. This extraction maintains sealing performance through the simplified direct-gate-to-seat design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

By merging the sealing functions into fewer integrated components (gate and seat assembly), the patent reduces manufacturing complexity while maintaining sealing performance through the streamlined configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly reduces maintenance needs, increases reliability, and ensures effective sealing across a wide pressure range, from low to high pressures, thereby improving the valve's classification and reducing the risk of uncontrolled fluid flow.

Implementation Method 1

spring-energized seal assemblies to provide a dynamic seal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11131393B2Gate valve
Publication Date: 2021.09.28 SRI ENERGY INC
  • US11131393B2 patent drawing
  • US11131393B2 patent drawing
  • US11131393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment includes a gate valve comprising: a valve body including a cavity coupled to a channel having proximal and distal portions; a gate to seal and unseal the channel; proximal and distal seats adjacent the gate; wherein (a) the proximal seat traverses towards the gate and stops at a first position when the gate is closing and the proximal channel portion is more highly pressurized than the cavity, and (b) the distal seat slides away from the gate and stops at a second position when the gate is closing and the cavity is more heavily pressurized than the distal channel portion. Other embodiments are described herein.