Monolithic Glenoid Baseplate for Stable Modular Bone Augments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing reverse shoulder glenoid implant baseplates are not adequately compatible with modular bone augments, and there is a need for improved integration of metallic bone augments.

Innovation Solution

The development of monolithic metallic glenoid implant baseplates with features such as posts, fins, and porous structures that accommodate and secure modular bone augments, providing orientational stability and facilitating bone ingrowth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing reverse shoulder glenoid implant baseplates are used, then the baseplate structure is simple, but compatibility with modular bone augments is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with modular bone augmentsVSAvoidbaseplate structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The baseplate is divided into functional segments including a reception portion for bone augments, a post portion for glenoid insertion, and a articular component portion. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall compatibility with modular bone augments without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The baseplate design incorporates multiple functional capabilities within a single structure: it provides reception and fixation for bone augments, serves as an insertion post for the glenoid, and supports the articular component. This multi-functionality improves adaptability without requiring separate components for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Stability of the object's composition

If modular bone augments are positioned between the glenoid and baseplate, then bone augmentation is achieved, but orientational stability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorientational stability of bone augmentVSAvoidsecure fixation of bone augment
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reception portion of the baseplate features an asymmetric geometry with a top surface that is not parallel to the bottom surface, creating a wedged configuration. This asymmetry provides inherent orientational stability for the bone augment, ensuring it maintains the correct orientation while being fixed between the baseplate and glenoid

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The baseplate incorporates localized features specifically designed for bone augment fixation, including the wedged reception portion with specific geometric characteristics. This local optimization of the reception area provides both orientational stability and secure fixation without requiring modifications to the entire baseplate structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of manufacture

If a monolithic metallic baseplate structure is used, then manufacturing integrity is improved, but integration of metallic bone augments is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing integrity of baseplateVSAvoidintegration of metallic bone augments
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The monolithic baseplate is designed with distinct functional segments (reception portion, post portion, articular component portion) that are integrated into a single metallic structure. This segmentation allows for optimized integration of metallic bone augments while maintaining the manufacturing advantages of a monolithic construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The baseplate design facilitates the integration of metallic bone augments with the monolithic metallic baseplate structure. The reception portion is specifically configured to receive and integrate with metallic bone augments, creating a composite metallic construction that combines the benefits of monolithic integrity with enhanced adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the compatibility and stability of modular bone augments, ensuring proper orientation and integration with the glenoid, while promoting bone ingrowth and secure fixation.

Implementation Method 1

the post comprises an outer surface and a plurality of porous surface portions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBone ingrowth: Porosity

Data Source

PatentUS20250375297A1Monolithic baseplate
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP
  • US20250375297A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375297A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375297A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of a novel glenoid implant baseplate are disclosed. Provided is a prosthesis for attachment to a glenoid that includes a baseplate body that is a monolithic metallic structure and incorporates a distal surface and a proximal surface, a post extending from the proximal surface, and features associated with the post that can provide orientation stability for a modular bone augment. Also disclosed is a prosthesis for attachment to a glenoid that includes a baseplate body that is a monolithic metallic structure that incorporates an integrally formed metallic bone augment.