Monolithic MEMS Device With Decoupling Trench

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing process for manufacturing MEMS devices involves complex bonding of three wafers, resulting in a thick and costly product with potential contamination and delamination issues due to the use of multiple semiconductor wafers and gluing materials.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic semiconductor body is used to form both cavities within a single substrate, eliminating the need for bonding multiple wafers and reducing the number of manufacturing steps, thereby simplifying the process and minimizing material usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If three wafers are bonded together to form MEMS device, then the device can achieve proper structural formation, but the device becomes thick and manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural formationVSAvoiddevice thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple wafer functions into a single monolithic semiconductor substrate. The sensitive region, peripheral portion, and both cavities are all formed within one continuous substrate rather than bonding three separate wafers, thereby reducing device thickness while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The monolithic substrate is segmented into functional regions including a sensitive region and a peripheral portion, separated by a decoupling trench. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each region while maintaining a thin overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If three wafers are bonded together to form MEMS device, then the device can achieve proper structural formation, but manufacturing complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural formationVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of three separate wafers into a single monolithic substrate, eliminating the need for complex wafer bonding processes, alignment procedures, and multiple manufacturing steps associated with multi-wafer assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single monolithic substrate serves multiple functions that previously required separate wafers: it provides the sensitive region, the peripheral portion, both cavities, and the mechanical support structure, thereby simplifying the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If bonding regions and gluing materials are used to fix cap and closing region, then the device can achieve proper assembly, but contamination risks and delamination issues increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveassemblyVSAvoidcontamination and delamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the need for separate cap and closing region assemblies by integrating all functional elements directly into the monolithic substrate. This removes the interfaces where bonding regions and gluing materials would be required, thereby eliminating contamination and delamination risks at these interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Strength

If sensitive region is connected to peripheral portion, then the device can achieve structural support, but package stress transfers to the sensitive part

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidstress transfer to sensitive part
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the stress path from the sensitive region by introducing a decoupling trench that separates the sensitive region from the peripheral portion. This allows the peripheral portion to bear package stress independently while the sensitive region remains isolated and protected from stress transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10626008B2Micro-electro-mechanical device and manufacturing process thereof
Publication Date: 2020.04.21 STMICROELECTRONICS SRL
  • US10626008B2 patent drawing
  • US10626008B2 patent drawing
  • US10626008B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micro-electro-mechanical device formed in a monolithic body of semiconductor material accommodating a first buried cavity; a sensitive region above the first buried cavity; and a second buried cavity extending in the sensitive region. A decoupling trench extends from a first face of the monolithic body as far as the first buried cavity and laterally surrounds the second buried cavity. The decoupling trench separates the sensitive region from a peripheral portion of the monolithic body.