Monolithic MIM Test Coupon Design for Feedstock Flow and Ejection Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Metal-injection-molded (MIM) test coupons face issues with feedstock flow restrictions, binder shearing, and warping due to their geometry, leading to defects such as flash and damage during the molding and sintering processes.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic precursor test coupon design with a grip portion, intermediate portion, and runners that provide stability and facilitate even feedstock distribution, along with a specialized mold and flash-removal tool to address these issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If feedstock injection pressure is increased to overcome the restriction in the reduced central cross-sectional area, then feedstock flow through the restriction is improved, but binder is sheared away from the feedstock material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedstock flow speedVSAvoidbinder distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The test coupon is divided into distinct geometric sections: grip portions with larger cross-sectional areas and an intermediate portion with a reduced central cross-sectional area. This segmentation allows different regions to serve different functions while managing feedstock flow characteristics throughout the injection process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-sectional area parameter is strategically varied along the length of the test coupon, with grip portions having larger areas than the intermediate portion. This parameter change creates a geometric progression that controls feedstock flow velocity and pressure distribution, preventing binder shearing while ensuring proper filling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Shape

If the long, narrow green part with reduced central cross-sectional area is subjected to typical mold-ejection techniques, then the coupon structure is maintained, but the coupon is damaged during ejection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupon geometryVSAvoidcoupon integrity during ejection
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The mold ejection system is segmented into multiple ejector pins distributed across the mold surface. These pins are positioned to contact the grip portions of the test coupon, distributing the ejection force over a larger area and preventing damage to the vulnerable reduced central cross-sectional area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple ejector pins provide counterbalancing support forces during the ejection process, distributing the mechanical load away from the weak reduced central cross-sectional area and preventing structural damage to the green part

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Speed

If elevated injection pressures are used to push feedstock through the reduced central cross-sectional area, then feedstock flow is maintained, but binder flows into spaces between ejector pins and mold, causing ejector pins to stick

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedstock injection speedVSAvoidejector pin functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The test coupon geometry is segmented into grip portions and an intermediate portion, with the grip portions positioned to interface with the ejection system. This segmentation isolates the high-pressure feedstock flow path from the ejection interface, preventing binder from reaching spaces between ejector pins and mold

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The grip portions act as an intermediary element between the feedstock injection system and the ejection system. They provide a transition zone that manages feedstock flow while protecting the ejection interface from binder contamination, ensuring reliable ejection pin functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the stability and integrity of the test coupons during processing, reduces defects like warping and flash, and enables accurate material property testing without complex alignment procedures.

Implementation Method 1

When injecting feedstock through the mold during the MIM process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInjection pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

the binder cross-links before injection is completed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal cross-linking: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 3

The brown part is then sintered at high temperatures to form the final, substantially metallic component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 4

the green part is subjected to de-binding, for example in a thermal or solvent-based process, to remove the binder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal de-binding: Thermolysis

Data Source

PatentUS11229951B2Monolithic precursor test coupons for testing material properties of metal-injection-molded components and methods and apparatuses for making such coupons
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 THE BOEING CO
  • US11229951B2 patent drawing
  • US11229951B2 patent drawing
  • US11229951B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of making a test coupon using a mold is provided. The mold defines a mold cavity that comprises a first-grip-portion cavity, a second-grip-portion cavity, an intermediate-portion cavity, interconnecting the first-grip-portion cavity and the second-grip-portion cavity, and runner cavities, directly interconnecting the first-grip-portion cavity and the second-grip-portion cavity and not directly connected to the intermediate-portion cavity. The method comprises injecting feedstock material, comprising a metal powder, into the mold cavity to form a monolithic precursor test coupon in the mold cavity, wherein the monolithic precursor test coupon comprises a first grip portion, a second grip portion, an intermediate portion, and runners. The method also comprises removing the runners from the monolithic precursor test coupon.