Monolithic Resistojet Thruster for 3000 K Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional resistojet thrusters for spacecraft operate at low temperatures, limiting fuel efficiency and requiring higher temperatures for improved performance, while facing challenges with viscous and heat losses, and maintaining structural integrity.

Innovation Solution

A resistojet thruster design utilizing refractory metals and alloys with high melting points, integrated heat-exchanger and resistive heating sections, and additive manufacturing techniques to create a joint-free, monolithic component that can achieve high stagnation temperatures up to 3000 K, minimizing weight and maximizing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional resistojet thrusters operate at low temperatures, then structural integrity is maintained, but fuel efficiency is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating temperatureVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter (using refractory metals with high melting points) to enable operation at higher temperatures (up to 3000 K), which directly improves fuel efficiency and specific impulse while maintaining structural integrity through the superior thermal properties of the selected materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If conventional resistojet thrusters operate at higher temperatures, then fuel efficiency improves, but viscous and heat losses increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidviscous and heat losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material structures, particularly in the heat exchanger section, combining refractory metals with optimized geometries to manage heat transfer more effectively. This reduces harmful heat losses to the structure while maintaining high propellant temperatures for improved efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Temperature

If conventional resistojet thrusters operate at higher temperatures, then fuel efficiency improves, but structural integrity becomes compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating temperatureVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the material parameter by selecting refractory metals (niobium, molybdenum, tantalum, tungsten, or rhenium) with melting points exceeding 2000°C, enabling the structure to maintain integrity at operating temperatures up to 3000 K that would melt conventional materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If separate, non-integrated heat exchanger is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidthruster weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the heat exchanger and resistive heating sections into a single integrated component, eliminating the need for separate assemblies and their associated joints. This integration reduces overall weight while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through additive manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

5Ease of manufacture

If joints are present in thruster components, then assembly is easier, but reliability decreases due to potential failure points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly easeVSAvoidcomponent reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates monolithic components without joints or seams, particularly in the heat exchanger and nozzle sections. This eliminates potential failure points at joints while maintaining ease of manufacture through additive manufacturing, which can produce complex monolithic structures in a single process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using additive manufacturing to create regions with optimized material properties and geometries tailored to specific functional requirements (heat transfer zones, structural support areas) within the monolithic component, achieving both reliability and manufacturing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables high-temperature operation with reduced weight and cost, achieving thruster efficiency of 65-90% and specific impulse of 60-100 seconds, while maintaining structural integrity and reducing heat losses.

Implementation Method 1

The power source applies electrical potential across the heat-exchanger section (e.g., between the inlet section and the nozzle section), thereby enabling the resistive heating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResistive heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11077964B1High-temperature electrothermal propulsion system
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 ELMET TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11077964B1 patent drawing
  • US11077964B1 patent drawing
  • US11077964B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In various embodiments, an electrothermal propulsion system for imparting velocity to a spacecraft features a joint-free monolithic integrated thruster component including an inlet section, a resistively heated heat-exchanger section, and a nozzle section.