Monolithic Rocker Arm Lattice Structure Oil Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rocker arms in internal combustion engines are heavy and have high moments of inertia, which reduces efficiency and durability, and they lack effective oil delivery mechanisms to enhance performance and longevity.

Innovation Solution

A lightweight, monolithic rocker arm component with a lattice structure and optimized geometry is manufactured using additive manufacturing, featuring a pushrod receiving member and a tongue element that directs oil flow for improved lubrication and reduced mass, allowing for a lower center of mass and moment of inertia, and incorporating a protective coating for wear resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If traditional cast rocker arms are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but mass and moment of inertia are excessive reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverocker arm massVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from traditional casting methods to additive manufacturing, enabling complex lattice structures and optimized geometries that reduce mass while maintaining manufacturability. The additive manufacturing process allows for precise control of material deposition, creating lightweight structures with optimized mass distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates porous materials through lattice structures within the rocker arm body. These lattice structures reduce overall mass and moment of inertia while maintaining structural integrity. The porous architecture allows for weight reduction of up to 15% compared to solid cast components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Weight of moving object

If rocker arm mass is reduced, then efficiency is enhanced, but durability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverocker arm massVSAvoidrocker arm durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing a protective coating on specific surfaces of the rocker arm that experience high wear. This coating provides enhanced durability and wear resistance at critical locations while maintaining the overall lightweight structure. The tongue element and pushrod receiving member receive specialized coating treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials by combining the base rocker arm material with a protective coating layer. This composite structure provides both the weight reduction benefits of the lightweight base material and the durability benefits of the protective coating, creating a multi-material system that optimizes both mass and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Weight of moving object

If additive manufacturing with lattice structure is used, then mass reduction is achieved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverocker arm massVSAvoidadditive manufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing computational optimization and simulation before the actual additive manufacturing process. Digital models are used to optimize the lattice structure geometry, mass distribution, and structural integrity before fabrication. This preliminary digital prototyping ensures that the final manufactured component meets precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If oil delivery mechanism is added, then lubrication is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelubrication effectivenessVSAvoidrocker arm structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the oil delivery mechanism with the rocker arm body itself, integrating lubrication channels and oil reservoirs directly into the additive manufactured structure. This integration eliminates the need for separate external oil delivery components, reducing overall system complexity while improving lubrication effectiveness. The oil delivery features are built as part of the monolithic rocker arm structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a rocker arm with reduced mass and improved efficiency, enhanced durability, and efficient oil delivery, leading to increased performance and extended lifespan, with a mass reduction of up to 15% compared to cast components.

Implementation Method 1

The rocker component is configured such that oil is introduced upward through the oil receiving aperture, deflected off of the second portion of the second surface of the pushrod receiving member, and directed toward the second end such that it flows along at least one surface of the tongue element.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid deflection:

Implementation Method 2

The first surface of the pushrod receiving member having the contour and the third surface of the tongue element include a protective coating disposed thereon.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWear resistance: Wear

Data Source

PatentUS10145271B2Mass-efficient rocking component
Publication Date: 2018.12.04 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10145271B2 patent drawing
  • US10145271B2 patent drawing
  • US10145271B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A monolithic rocker arm component includes a first lateral wall defining a first aperture and a first mass reducing feature, an opposing second wall defining a second aperture and a second mass reducing feature, a pushrod receiving member that bridges the first lateral wall and the second lateral wall at a first end of the rocker arm, and a tongue element that bridges the first lateral wall and the second lateral wall at a second end of the rocker arm. The pushrod receiving member routes oil from the first towards the second end. The monolithic rocker arm may have one or more internal regions having lattice structures. Methods for additive manufacturing the monolithic rocker component are also provided.