Monolithic X-ray Detector Stack Energy Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional x-ray detection systems have limited energy resolution and are bulky, leading to reduced sensitivity and complications in aligning images from multiple detectors due to parallax effects, which hinder the accurate analysis of target materials.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic stack of thin x-ray detector layers with a TFT backplane and radiation converter, fabricated on thin polyimide substrates, where each layer is closely spaced and oriented perpendicularly to facilitate electronic connections, reducing parallax shifts and enhancing energy resolution by combining images from multiple layers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple individual detectors are stacked for energy resolution, then energy resolution is improved, but the system becomes bulky and parallax effects complicate image comparison

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy resolutionVSAvoidsystem bulkiness and parallax effects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple detector layers are merged into a single monolithic detector unit with integrated TFT backplane and scintillator layers. This integration eliminates the need for separate detector housings and reduces the overall system bulk while maintaining energy resolution capabilities through the stacked layer structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The detector layers are arranged in a perpendicular orientation rather than parallel stacking. This dimensional change reduces the spacing between layers and minimizes parallax effects by orienting the detector surfaces at right angles to each other, thereby simplifying image alignment while preserving energy discrimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If detectors are fabricated on thick substrates such as glass, then structural support is provided, but extra materials contribute to excess absorption of x-rays and reduce sensitivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidx-ray absorption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The detector is fabricated on a thin flexible substrate instead of conventional thick glass substrates. This thin film approach provides sufficient structural support while minimizing the amount of material that absorbs x-rays, thereby reducing energy loss and improving detector sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The substrate thickness parameter is changed from conventional thick glass to a thin flexible substrate. This parameter change reduces the absorption path length for x-rays while maintaining the mechanical integrity needed for detector operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If detectors are separated by significant spacing, then electronic connections are facilitated, but the parallax effect complicates image comparison

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectronic connectionsVSAvoidimage alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Detector layers are oriented perpendicular to each other rather than parallel, which reduces the spacing required between layers while minimizing parallax effects. This orthogonal arrangement allows electronic connections to be made along different dimensions, facilitating manufacturing while maintaining precise image alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The compact monolithic stack improves energy resolution and reduces parallax effects, enabling more accurate and precise energy-resolved imaging by minimizing the thickness and spacing between detector layers, thus enhancing the sensitivity and alignment of x-ray energy information.

Implementation Method 1

a detector has a radiation converter such as a scintillator to convert x-rays to visible light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

a TFT backplane (which typically contains a photodiode and a transistor for each pixel)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

a direct detector comprising an x-ray photoconductor and a thin film transistor (TFT)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoconduction: Photoconductivity

Data Source

PatentUS10353083B2Monolithic digital x-ray detector stack with energy resolution
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US10353083B2 patent drawing
  • US10353083B2 patent drawing
  • US10353083B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A monolithic stack of thin x-ray detector layers capable of energy resolution is described. The stack is made of detector layers thinner and closer together than other x-ray detectors, avoiding the need to correct for parallax shifts. Moreover, the system's ability to combine multiple x-ray detector images accurately enables it to resolve x-ray energy information better than existing systems. The system can include a monolithic stack of x-ray detector layers, wherein a respective detector layer contains an x-ray detector and is less than 2 millimeters thick.