Monopole Antenna Inductor Loop Layout for Lower SAR

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing antenna forms in electronic devices are unable to meet the requirements for improved radiation performance, bandwidth, efficiency, and reduced Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in challenging environments.

Innovation Solution

A terminal monopole antenna with a magnetic current loop mechanism, utilizing inductors to create a closed magnetic current loop and even electric field distribution, allowing for direct or coupled feeding, and optimized inductor values for different frequency bands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional monopole antenna forms are used, then the antenna structure is simple, but the radiation performance, bandwidth, and system efficiency are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation performanceVSAvoidantenna structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The antenna is divided into distinct functional segments: a radiation branch with specific length constraints (less than quarter wavelength), inductors positioned at strategic locations, and a feeding branch separated from the radiation branch. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for its specific function while contributing to overall improved radiation performance and bandwidth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Inductors are introduced as intermediary elements between the radiation branch and reference ground, and between the feeding branch and radiation branch. These inductors create a magnetic current loop mechanism that enhances the antenna's radiation efficiency and bandwidth without requiring a complete redesign of the basic monopole structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional monopole antenna forms are used, then the antenna structure is simple, but the bandwidth is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebandwidthVSAvoidantenna structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies particular parameter ranges to achieve enhanced bandwidth: the radiation branch length is constrained to be less than one-quarter of the operating wavelength, inductor values are optimized for different frequency bands (e.g., 5-47 nH for 450-1000 MHz, 1-33 nH for 1-3 GHz, 0.5-10 nH for 3-10 GHz), and the feeding branch dimensions are carefully controlled. These parameter optimizations enable broadband operation across multiple frequency ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If conventional monopole antenna forms are used, then the antenna structure is simple, but the system efficiency and radiation efficiency are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidantenna structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Inductors serve as intermediary elements that create a magnetic current loop, improving the coupling between the feeding branch and radiation branch. This mechanism enhances system efficiency by reducing losses and improving power transfer, while the inductors are positioned and dimensioned to minimize their impact on overall structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The antenna design incorporates dynamic current distribution patterns through the magnetic current loop mechanism, allowing the electromagnetic fields to be more effectively distributed and utilized. This dynamic field distribution improves radiation efficiency without requiring static structural modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional monopole antenna forms are used, then the antenna structure is simple, but the SAR value is higher

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSARVSAvoidantenna structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates localized regions with different electromagnetic field characteristics through strategic placement of inductors and the magnetic current loop mechanism. By concentrating magnetic field energy in specific regions and creating more uniform electric field distribution in other areas, the design reduces peak SAR values while maintaining overall radiation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Reliability

If the radiation branch length is less than quarter wavelength, then the antenna achieves better radiation performance and lower SAR, but the antenna operates in a non-traditional mode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation performanceVSAvoidoperating mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent fundamentally changes the operating parameter of radiation branch length from the conventional quarter-wavelength to a shorter length (less than quarter wavelength). This parameter change, combined with the introduction of inductors, creates a new operating mechanism based on magnetic current loops that delivers superior radiation performance and reduced SAR, while the specific length constraints are optimized for different frequency bands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances radiation performance, improves bandwidth and system efficiency, and reduces SAR by generating a more even electric field and closed magnetic current loop, outperforming conventional antennas in similar conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a first end of the radiator is electrically connected to a reference ground through a first inductor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic energy storage: Inductor

Implementation Method 2

the antenna may form a closed magnetic current loop during operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12494584B2Terminal monopole antenna
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 HONOR DEVICE CO LTD
  • US12494584B2 patent drawing
  • US12494584B2 patent drawing
  • US12494584B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of this application disclose a terminal monopole antenna, relating to the technical field of antennas. The antenna includes a radiation branch, the radiation branch includes at least one radiator, and a first end of the radiator is electrically connected to a reference ground through a first inductor. When the terminal monopole antenna is directly fed by a feeding point, a second end of the radiator is electrically connected to the feeding point. When the terminal monopole antenna is coupled and fed, the second end is electrically connected to the reference ground through a second inductor. The terminal monopole antenna further includes a feeding branch, the feeding branch is configured to perform coupled feeding to the radiation branch. A length of the radiation branch is less than a quarter of an operating wavelength of the terminal monopole antenna.