High Isolation Multi-Band Monopole Antenna Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In MIMO systems, placing antennas in close proximity leads to mutual surface radiation coupling, defocusing of main beam radiation due to ground reflectors, and low isolation, causing signal interference and band-to-band coupling, which are challenging to address under space constraints.

Innovation Solution

A high isolation multi-band monopole antenna design incorporating an RF choke to reduce reflection interference and a high pass circuit to prevent band-to-band coupling, allowing for close antenna placement without compromising beam width or increasing interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If antennas are placed in close proximity to reduce space usage, then space efficiency is improved, but mutual surface radiation coupling and signal interference increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna base areaVSAvoidmutual surface radiation coupling
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an RF choke as an intermediary component between the antenna and ground reflector. This RF choke acts as a mediator that blocks surface radiation currents while allowing the antenna to maintain its radiation pattern. By placing this intermediary element, the harmful mutual coupling between closely spaced antennas is prevented without requiring increased separation distance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes the harmful surface radiation component from the system by using the RF choke to block surface currents on the ground reflector. This extraction of the harmful surface wave component allows the antennas to operate in close proximity without experiencing mutual coupling effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Area of stationary object

If antennas are placed in close proximity to reduce space usage, then space efficiency is improved, but isolation between antennas deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantenna base areaVSAvoidantenna isolation
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The RF choke serves as an intermediary that provides high impedance to surface currents, thereby improving isolation between antennas. This mediator component allows the system to achieve 40 dB isolation even when antennas are placed within 0.5 wavelength of each other, which would normally provide insufficient isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Power

If antennas are elevated above a large ground reflector to improve radiation, then radiation performance is improved, but a small antenna base defocuses the reflection of the main beam

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation powerVSAvoidbeam focus
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful surface radiation component that causes defocusing effects. By removing this surface wave component through the RF choke, the main beam reflection from the ground reflector remains focused and effective, even with a small antenna base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If wide beam antennas are used to exploit multi-path capabilities, then system capacity is improved, but interference and band-to-band coupling between beams increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capacityVSAvoidband-to-band coupling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The RF choke acts as a mediator that prevents surface radiation from coupling between antennas operating at different frequency bands. This allows wide beam antennas to be used for multi-path exploitation while maintaining isolation between different frequency bands through the high impedance barrier provided by the RF choke.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves up to 40 dB isolation between antennas, reducing interference and maintaining wide beam characteristics, even when antennas are in close proximity, thereby enhancing MIMO system performance.

Implementation Method 1

mutual surface radiation from the antennas can couple with each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface radiation coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

band-to-band coupling between beams from antennas operating at different frequencies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBand-to-band coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

when the antennas are elevated above a large ground reflector, a small antenna base can defocus the reflection of the main beam radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGround reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS8253647B2High isolation multi-band monopole antenna for MIMO systems
Publication Date: 2012.08.28 PCTEL INC
  • US8253647B2 patent drawing
  • US8253647B2 patent drawing
  • US8253647B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A high isolation multi-band monopole antenna that can be used in connection with MIMO systems is provided. The antenna can include various components to prevent band to band coupling and provide isolation from neighboring antennas.