Straddle Monorail Compartment Hinge and Rail-Merged Escape Door

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Straddle-type monorail trains face challenges with high costs, large occupied space, and stability issues due to the complex structure of their escape passages, which include additional frames and floors that increase weight and unpredictability during emergencies.

Innovation Solution

A rail vehicle design featuring a vehicle body with sequentially hinged compartments, where only compartments at the ends are connected to bogies, and an escape door mechanism that opens into the rail, reducing the need for additional structures and optimizing space and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If additional frames and floors are provided to form an escape passage, then passenger evacuation capability is improved, but device complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger evacuation capabilityVSAvoidescape passage structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The escape passage is merged with the rail structure itself. The rail serves dual functions: supporting the vehicle during normal operation and providing the escape passage structure during emergencies. This eliminates the need for separate frames and floors, directly resolving the contradiction between evacuation capability and structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rail is designed with multi-functionality: it serves as both the support structure for vehicle operation and the escape passage for emergency evacuation. This universal design allows the same structure to fulfill multiple purposes, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining evacuation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If frames and floors are disposed along the entire length of the rail, then escape passage availability is improved, but occupied space increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveescape passage availabilityVSAvoidoccupied space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the escape passage with the rail structure, the passage is contained within the existing rail footprint rather than extending beyond it. The rail's cross-sectional geometry provides the passage space, eliminating the need for additional lateral space that would be required by separate frames and floors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If frames and floors are erected on the rail, then escape passage functionality is improved, but weight borne by the rail increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveescape passage functionalityVSAvoidweight borne by the rail
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The escape passage structure is merged into the rail itself, eliminating the need for additional frames and floors. The rail material serves both structural support and passage formation functions, removing the extra weight that would be imposed by separate escape passage components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rail performs multiple functions simultaneously: vehicle support during operation and escape passage structure during emergencies. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for dedicated escape passage components that would add additional weight to the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the rail bears additional weight of frames and floors, then escape passage structure is completed, but stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveescape passage structureVSAvoidrail stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the escape passage with the rail structure, the system avoids adding extra weight components. The rail maintains its original weight characteristics, preserving its stability properties while still providing the necessary escape passage functionality through its structural design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11312399B2Rail transport system
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 BYD CO LTD
  • US11312399B2 patent drawing
  • US11312399B2 patent drawing
  • US11312399B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses a rail vehicle. The rail vehicle includes: a plurality of bogies, where the bogie has a straddle recess suitable for straddling a rail; and a vehicle body, where the vehicle body is connected to the plurality of bogies and pulled by the plurality of bogies to travel along the rail, and the vehicle body includes a plurality of compartments hinged sequentially along a length direction of the rail; the plurality of compartments forms at least one compartment group, the compartment group includes three compartments hinged sequentially, and the bottom of each of only compartments that are located at two ends of the compartment group and that are of the three compartments is connected to the bogie; and in the length direction of the rail, a surface that is of a compartment at at least one end of the vehicle body and that faces away from an adjacent compartment is provided with an escape door that can be opened and closed. The rail vehicle according to this embodiment of the present disclosure facilitates optimization of the structure of an escape passage, reduction in occupied space and the weight borne by the rail, and improvement in stability, and is flexible in steering and low in costs.