Monte Carlo Risk Transfer Model for Drilling NPT Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The oil and gas industry faces challenges in accurately assessing and managing non-productive time (NPT) and well completion risk, which affects drilling operators' performance metrics and profitability, with existing methods lacking precision and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A risk transfer model (RTM) is developed to quantify NPT risk using Monte Carlo trials and field parameters, such as drilling time, location, and downhole tools, to generate a non-productive time distribution and output risk transfer model results, enabling more accurate risk assessment and insurance structure pricing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional methods are used to assess NPT risk, then the assessment process is simple, but the precision and reliability of the assessment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNPT risk assessment precisionVSAvoidrisk assessment model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the risk assessment by changing from qualitative parameters to quantitative parameters. It introduces specific measurable parameters such as NPT distribution, mean NPT, standard deviation, and variance, allowing for precise numerical assessment of drilling risk rather than relying on vague qualitative evaluations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional manual or heuristic risk assessment methods with a computational statistical model. It uses probability distributions, Monte Carlo simulations, and mathematical calculations to substitute for conventional expert judgment and experience-based assessment, thereby improving precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If more comprehensive parameters are used to assess NPT risk, then the reliability improves, but the complexity of the assessment process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewell completion risk reliabilityVSAvoidrisk transfer model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex risk assessment into distinct manageable components: it separates NPT calculation from BRT (Below Rotary Table) hours, divides the risk assessment into different scenarios (with and without insurance), and breaks down the statistical analysis into separate steps (distribution generation, mean calculation, variance calculation). This segmentation reduces the perceived complexity while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal risk assessment framework that can be applied to various drilling scenarios and well completion types. The model handles multiple parameters (NPT, BRT, total hours) and can accommodate different insurance structures, making it a multi-functional tool that improves reliability across diverse applications without requiring separate assessment methods for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If quantitative analysis is performed to improve risk assessment accuracy, then the precision improves, but the time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance metric measurement precisionVSAvoidrisk assessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calculations of NPT distribution, mean, and standard deviation before the actual risk assessment. By pre-computing these statistical parameters and storing them in the model, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming real-time calculations during the risk assessment process, thereby improving precision without proportionally increasing analysis time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250005686A1Method of predicting drilling and well operation
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION & INSURANCE CO
  • US20250005686A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005686A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005686A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus and system is provided for assessing risk for well completion, comprising: obtaining, using an input interface, a Below Rotary Table hours and a plurality of well-field parameters for one or more planned runs, determining, using at least one processor, one or more non-productive time values that correspond to the one or more planned runs based upon the well-field parameters, developing, using at least one processor, a non-productive time distribution and a Below Rotary Table distribution via one or more Monte Carlo trials; and outputting, using a graphic display, a risk transfer model results based on a total BRT hours from the Below Rotary Table and the non-productive time distribution produced from the one or more Monte Carlo trials.