Mop Base Kinematic Locking With Retractable Foot Lever

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mop base kinematic locking and unlocking systems fail to balance stability, ease of use, and interference-free operation during cleaning, particularly when attaching or detaching the mop for wringing, often causing operational encumbrance and unclear control mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A kinematic system comprising hinged half-frames with a lever and elastic elements, where the lever is housed within the mop base in the closed state and protrudes for easy foot-operated unlocking, featuring a counter surface groove or tooth to prevent accidental operation, allowing smooth transition between open and closed states without obstructing cleaning or wringing processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the lever protrudes beyond the mop base profile for easy access, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of accidental operation and interference during cleaning increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility of controlVSAvoidaccidental operation and interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The lever dynamically changes its position relative to the mop base profile - it protrudes when the base is open for easy foot access, and retracts within the profile when closed to avoid interference. This dynamic positioning resolves the contradiction between accessibility and safety from accidental operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The counter surface acts as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between the lever and the second half-frame. It provides controlled interference that prevents accidental closing while allowing intentional opening, thus resolving the contradiction by enabling selective interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the lever is contained within the mop base profile, then interference-free operation is improved, but ease of access for operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference during cleaningVSAvoidaccessibility of control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lever's position is dynamic rather than static - it moves between being contained within the profile (when closed) and protruding beyond it (when open). This dynamic behavior allows the system to optimize for interference-free operation at one state and ease of access at another.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If the lever protrudes to enable foot operation, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of mistaken operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoot-operated controlVSAvoidprotection from mistaken operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The counter surface serves as a selective intermediary that allows intentional foot operation (when the lever protrudes and the base is open) while preventing mistaken operation (when the lever is retracted and the base is closed). The counter surface geometry provides this selective permission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The counter surface creates preliminary anti-action by positioning geometric features (groove or tooth) that actively prevent the lever from accidentally engaging the second half-frame. This preliminary prevention mechanism stops mistaken operations before they can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

4Reliability

If the kinematic system interferes with the second half-frame to prevent return to closed state, then locking reliability is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking stabilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The counter surface acts as a sophisticated intermediary that provides reliable locking through controlled interference. Rather than adding complex locking mechanisms, it uses the geometry of the counter surface (groove or tooth) to create simple yet effective interference that prevents unintended return to the closed state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides a reliable, user-friendly, and interference-free mechanism for locking and unlocking the mop base, ensuring stability and ease of use, allowing mop replacement and wringing without encumbrance, and is accessible from both sides for versatility.

Implementation Method 1

elastic devices, where said lever, when forced to rotate by said elastic devices, is exposed beyond the profile of said second half-frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic energy storage and release: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP2739197B1Locking and unlocking kinetic motion of a mop base
Publication Date: 2018.07.18 TTS CLEANING SRL
  • EP2739197B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2739197B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2739197B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Locking and unlocking kinematic motion of a mop base, and relative procedure for locking and unlocking making use of said kinematic motion, aimed at holding a mop base in a stable position, both open and closed.