Mop head

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mops are inefficient due to incomplete protection of surfaces from scratching, cumbersome mounting and dismounting processes, poor cleaning capabilities, especially in edges and corners, and lack of variety in design and affordability.

Innovation Solution

A mop with a top wraparound design covering metal and plastic handle mechanisms, easy mounting and dismounting via a flap, and a design that allows effective cleaning in tight spaces using a terry cloth material with Velcro and mesh for stability and dirt removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional mops are used, then the basic mopping function is provided, but the surface being cleaned is scratched and scraped by exposed metal and plastic mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface scratchingVSAvoidhandle mechanism exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a flexible cover made of soft material that wraps around the mop handle mechanisms. This thin film/shell structure protects the exposed metal and plastic parts from contacting and scratching the floor surface, while remaining flexible enough to conform to the handle shape and allow operational movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Ease of operation

If string models with clamps are used, then mounting is simplified, but the clamp is hard to press down and dislodge the bulky mop head is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting easeVSAvoidclamp mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the problematic clamp mechanism entirely and replaces it with a snap-fit system. The mop head features a tapered insertion end that engages with corresponding receptacles on the handle, eliminating the need for clamps and providing easy one-handed attachment and detachment without bulky components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a clamp that requires pressing down to secure and then pressing down to release, the patent inverts the mechanism to use a snap-fit system where insertion automatically secures the mop head, and removal simply requires pulling outward. This reverses the operational sequence and eliminates the difficulty of pressing down hard components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If sponge models with screws are used, then mounting is secure, but it is very time consuming and awkward to screw the screws on

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting securityVSAvoidmounting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the screw-based mechanical fastening system with a snap-fit mechanism. The tapered insertion end of the mop head engages with spring-loaded or elastic receptacles on the handle, providing secure mounting through elastic deformation rather than threaded mechanical engagement, thereby eliminating the time-consuming screwing action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If snaps are used for mounting, then mounting is simpler, but they are hard to press down and close and difficult to unsnap

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting simplicityVSAvoidsnap mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional snap mechanism operation. Instead of requiring downward pressure to engage and upward force to release, the design uses a tapered insertion that automatically engages the snap feature during insertion, and simple outward pulling motion to release. This reverses the force direction and eliminates the difficulty of pressing down hard snaps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

5Adaptability or versatility

If string models are used, then the mop can reach edges and corners, but the strings separate and streak when cleaning requiring extra passes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveedge and corner accessVSAvoidcleaning uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a homogeneous solid cloth material instead of separate string elements. This uniform construction ensures consistent cleaning performance across the entire mop surface without string separation or streaking, while the flexible cloth still conforms to edges and corners effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

6Adaptability or versatility

If sponge mops are used, then the mop can reach tight spaces, but they just push the dirt from one place to another and do not pick up the dirt

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetight space accessVSAvoiddirt pickup capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a porous absorbent cloth material that can penetrate and capture dirt particles through capillary action and adhesion. The porous structure allows the cloth to absorb liquids and trap suspended particles, effectively picking up dirt rather than merely pushing it along, while maintaining the flexibility needed for tight space access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides protection against scratching, easy handling for all age groups, superior cleaning performance in corners and edges, and availability in various colors and prints, making the mopping process more efficient and pleasant.

Implementation Method 1

a wrap section that prevents scratching of the floor by wrapping around and covering the plastic or metal parts of a mop handle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier protection:

Implementation Method 2

two pieces of Velcro to hold the wrap together

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVelcro fastening: Velcro

Implementation Method 3

a narrow piece of mesh attached to a bottom edge to stabilize the bottom edge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStructural reinforcement:

Implementation Method 4

a wide piece of mesh added to the top edge to scrape off tough dirt from the floor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical scraping:

Implementation Method 5

a flap that fits into the mechanism of a mop handle holding mop head securely to the mop handle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint:

Data Source

PatentUS10413811B2Mop head
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 AMATUCCI JOSEPHINE
  • US10413811B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mop head that attached to a mop handle with a number of functional parts. A padded cloth added to give more padding to the back of the mop head, a wrap that prevents scratching of the floor by wrapping around and covering the plastic or metal parts of a mop handle, two pieces of Velcro that secure wrap closed, a narrow mesh stitched to the bottom edge to strengthen bottom edge, a wide mesh that scrapes off tough dirt from floor and a flap that fits inside the mechanism of a mop handle. The mechanism receives and holds the mop head securely to the mop handle and a bottom mopping section.