Moral Analyzer for Text Data Ethics Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Companies face challenges in quantitatively and objectively evaluating moral expressions related to social responsibility, corporate ethics, and human rights in large amounts of text data, which is essential for timely and appropriate measures, but current techniques lack the capability to analyze these aspects effectively.

Innovation Solution

A moral analyzer is developed, comprising an extraction unit that identifies morality-related words from text data using a dictionary and an analysis unit that evaluates moral values based on these words, employing a moral foundations theory to classify expressions as virtues or vices, enabling objective analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If text data is collected using keyword-based acquisition techniques, then the quantity of text data increases, but the capability to evaluate moral expressions remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of text dataVSAvoidevaluation capability of moral expressions
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the analysis process into distinct functional units: an extraction unit that identifies moral expression words from text data using dictionary matching, and an analysis unit that evaluates the moral value of extracted expressions. This segmentation enables specialized processing for moral evaluation while handling large volumes of text data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dictionary data containing moral expression words and their categories as an intermediary between the raw text data and the evaluation process. This intermediary enables systematic identification and classification of moral expressions, bridging the gap between unstructured text and quantitative moral evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual analysis is performed by individuals with specialized knowledge, then the accuracy of moral evaluation improves, but the efficiency and scalability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of moral evaluationVSAvoidefficiency of analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to perform moral evaluation automatically without requiring continuous human intervention. The extraction unit and analysis unit work autonomously to identify and evaluate moral expressions in text data, allowing organizations to process large volumes of data efficiently while maintaining consistent evaluation standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the abstract concept of moral evaluation into quantifiable parameters by categorizing moral expressions into distinct types (e.g., care, fairness, authority, purity, ingroup) and measuring their frequencies and intensities in text data. This parameterization enables objective comparison and analysis of moral values across different datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12093653B2Analyzer, moral analysis method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 HITACHI LTD
  • US12093653B2 patent drawing
  • US12093653B2 patent drawing
  • US12093653B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A moral analysis unit extracts, as a moral expression word, a word matching a morality-related word related to morality from acquired data which is text data on the basis of a moral foundations dictionary which is dictionary data defining the morality-related word. A processed data display unit analyzes the moral value of the acquired data by using the moral expression word.