Motion-Insensitive Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Algorithm

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) techniques are susceptible to patient motion, particularly in early stages of data acquisition, which can lead to motion artifacts and reduce the diagnostic value of MRI scans, especially in vulnerable patient populations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a motion-insensitive magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MORF) method that uses a series of variable sequence blocks to produce distinct signal evolutions in resonant species, with a computer system identifying and compensating for motion-corrupted image frames to generate motion-compensated data, thereby reducing the sensitivity to patient motion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional MRF techniques are used, then the diagnostic information can be obtained, but motion artifacts are introduced and measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidmotion artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by acquiring multiple images at different time points before final analysis. Motion correction is performed iteratively using these preliminary images to estimate motion fields, which are then applied to correct the MRI data. This preliminary acquisition and iterative correction process enables the system to compensate for patient motion before final diagnostic images are produced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring image quality metrics and motion parameters throughout the acquisition process. The estimated motion fields from preliminary images are fed back into the correction process, where they are used to adjust and refine the final image reconstruction. This feedback loop enables dynamic adaptation to patient motion patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If the scan duration is extended to improve diagnostic value, then more diagnostic information is obtained, but patient motion increases and harmful factors worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic informationVSAvoidpatient motion
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system acquires preliminary images at multiple time points during the scan to establish baseline data for motion correction. These preliminary actions enable the system to track and compensate for motion throughout the extended acquisition period, allowing longer scan durations without proportionally increasing motion artifacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from continuously monitored motion parameters to adjust the correction process in real-time during extended scans. This enables the system to maintain image quality throughout prolonged acquisition periods by dynamically adapting to changing patient motion patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-affected harmful factors

If anesthesia is used to eliminate patient motion, then motion artifacts are reduced, but scan duration increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient motionVSAvoidscan efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from motion monitoring to identify and correct motion artifacts without requiring anesthesia. By continuously tracking motion parameters and applying iterative correction algorithms, the system can maintain scan efficiency while eliminating the need for anesthesia-induced patient immobilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting and correcting motion artifacts through iterative algorithms that process the acquired images. This self-correcting capability eliminates the need for external intervention such as anesthesia, thereby maintaining scan efficiency and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The MORF algorithm effectively suppresses motion artifacts, improving the accuracy of MRI scans and reducing the need for anesthesia, thereby enhancing the diagnostic and therapeutic value of the imaging process.

Implementation Method 1

magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), which is described, as one example, by D. Ma, et al., in Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting, Nature, 2013; 495 (7440): 187-192

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic resonance:

Implementation Method 2

A series of initial image frames is generated with the computer system by comparing the magnetic resonance data to a dictionary of signal evolutions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal evolution comparison:

Implementation Method 3

Motion-compensated magnetic resonance data are generated with the computer system by applying the estimated subject motion to the provided magnetic resonance data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMotion compensation:

Data Source

PatentUS10670680B2System and method for motion insensitive magnetic resonance fingerprinting
Publication Date: 2020.06.02 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV
  • US10670680B2 patent drawing
  • US10670680B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for magnetic resonance fingerprinting (“MRF”) that are more robust to patient motion than conventional MRF techniques are described. The methods described in the present disclosure provide an image reconstruction algorithm for MRF that decreases the motion sensitivity of MRF.