Morphing Panel Structure with Intersecting Web Core

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional morphing panel structures in aerospace applications are often resistant to in-plane deformation, compromising their ability to withstand out-of-plane bending or flexing deformation, which is crucial for aerodynamic functionality.

Innovation Solution

A core-based morphing panel structure with a composite facesheet and a stiffening core in an intersecting web configuration, featuring elastomeric matrix layers and reinforcing elements, allows for resistance to out-of-plane deformation while maintaining in-plane deformation capability, incorporating actuators for shape change.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional panel structures are used to provide structural support, then out-of-plane bending resistance is improved, but in-plane deformation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveout-of-plane bending resistanceVSAvoidin-plane deformation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The panel structure is divided into multiple discrete core members arranged in an intersecting web configuration, creating a segmented stiffening system. This segmentation allows the structure to provide out-of-plane support through the distributed core members while permitting in-plane deformation through the spaces between members and the compliant facesheet design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stiffening core provides localized structural support at specific positions where core members intersect and attach to the facesheet, while other regions maintain compliance for morphing. The core members are strategically positioned to provide support exactly where needed without restricting overall in-plane deformation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If stiffening core is added to resist out-of-plane deformation, then bending rigidity is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending rigidityVSAvoidpanel structure weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than using a continuous solid core that would add significant weight, the structure employs segmented core members arranged in an intersecting web pattern. This segmentation reduces material usage while maintaining bending rigidity through the distributed stiffening effect of multiple discrete members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The intersecting web configuration creates a porous or open-cell structure with core spaces between members. This porous architecture provides sufficient out-of-plane support through the distributed core members while minimizing weight by reducing material volume compared to a solid core construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Strength

If composite facesheet with reinforcing layers is used, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The composite facesheet uses reinforcing layers made from the same material composition as the core members (foam, fabric, or composite material), creating a homogeneous structure throughout. This material homogeneity simplifies manufacturing by allowing consistent fabrication processes and material handling across different components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The structure employs composite materials combining foam, fabric, or composite layers in both the facesheet and core members. This composite construction provides high structural strength-to-weight ratio while the use of similar composite materials throughout simplifies the manufacturing process through consistent material properties and fabrication techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances bending rigidity to resist aerodynamic pressures and buckling while minimizing weight, enabling efficient morphing deformations with minimal control energy, suitable for aerospace and other applications.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of elastomeric matrix layers laminated with the reinforcing layers in the composite facesheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a stiffening core having a plurality of core members in an intersecting web configuration provided on the composite facesheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric stability: Geometry

Data Source

PatentUS8703268B2Morphing panel structure
Publication Date: 2014.04.22 THE BOEING CO
  • US8703268B2 patent drawing
  • US8703268B2 patent drawing
  • US8703268B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A panel structure includes a composite facesheet and a stiffening core having a plurality of core members in an intersecting web configuration provided on the composite facesheet.