Morphing Unmanned Vehicles for Tight-Space Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned vehicles (UVs) lack the ability to adapt their form or function in response to changing conditions, such as damage or spatial constraints, limiting their effectiveness in complex environments like combat zones and commercial settings.

Innovation Solution

The development of polymorphic UVs equipped with morphing engines, sensor management systems, and programmable polymers that allow them to change shape, detach into sub-drones, or reconfigure sensors based on sensed conditions, enabling them to navigate through tight spaces and protect sensitive components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If unmanned vehicles maintain a fixed form and configuration, then their structure is simple and reliable, but they cannot adapt to changing conditions or navigate tight spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing conditionsVSAvoidvehicle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unmanned vehicle is divided into multiple detachable components including a mothership device and sub-drones. These segments can separate and reconfigure based on mission requirements, allowing the vehicle to adapt to different conditions while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle configuration is made dynamic through morphing engines and programmable polymers that enable real-time shape changes. The unmanned vehicles can transform between different forms (e.g., nested configuration for transport, dispersed configuration for mission execution) based on sensed conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If unmanned vehicles use a fixed configuration, then manufacturing and operation are straightforward, but they cannot navigate through tight spaces or hard-to-reach areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to navigate tight spacesVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Sub-drones are nested within the mothership device during transport and storage. This nesting configuration allows the system to pass through tight spaces and be easily deployed, while the sub-drones can disperse when needed to perform missions in hard-to-reach areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle structure incorporates morphing capabilities that allow it to dynamically adjust its configuration. Programmable polymers enable the vehicle to change shape from a compact nested form to an expanded operational form, facilitating navigation through varying spatial constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If unmanned vehicles have fixed sensor orientations, then the system is simpler and more reliable, but they cannot effectively survey different sectors or adapt to different mission requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor reconfiguration capabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensor orientations are made dynamic through morphing engines that can reposition sensors in real-time. The sensor management system detects mission requirements and automatically reconfigures sensor orientations to optimize survey coverage for different sectors and mission types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system is designed to be multi-functional, with sensors that can be reoriented to perform different survey functions. The same physical sensors can survey different sectors by changing orientation, eliminating the need for multiple fixed sensor arrays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If unmanned vehicles cannot change form, then their structure is more reliable and easier to manufacture, but they lack operational flexibility in complex environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidvehicle reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle system is segmented into modular components with standardized interfaces. This segmentation allows for easier testing and validation of individual modules, improving reliability while enabling flexible reconfiguration for different operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A sensor management system provides real-time feedback about mission conditions and vehicle status. This feedback loop enables the vehicle to make intelligent decisions about when and how to morph, maintaining reliability through condition-based activation rather than random or forced transformations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11912407B1Unmanned vehicle morphing
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US11912407B1 patent drawing
  • US11912407B1 patent drawing
  • US11912407B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Unmanned vehicles may be terrestrial, aerial, nautical, or multi-mode. Unmanned vehicles may accomplish tasks by breaking out into sub-drones, re-grouping itself, changing form, or re-orienting its sensors.