Morphing Window Controls for Intuitive Docking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing GUI window control systems lack intuitive and visually engaging methods for users to dock windows, limiting user interaction and efficiency in managing window positions on computer interfaces.

Innovation Solution

The method involves morphing window controls from minimize, maximize, and close icons into docking controls (left and right arrows) through animation, allowing users to preview and activate docking by holding a click, with a bubble indicator signaling the docking snap, and reverting back to original controls upon cancellation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional window controls (minimize, maximize, close) are used, then the interface is simple and familiar, but the user interaction is not intuitive for docking windows and lacks visual engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintuitiveness of window docking interactionVSAvoidcomplexity of control transformation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The window controls dynamically transform from traditional minimize/maximize/close icons to docking arrows based on user interaction state. When the user hovers over or presses a window control, it morphs into directional arrows indicating docking options. This dynamic transformation allows the interface to adapt its functionality based on user intent, making the docking operation more intuitive without permanently complicating the interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The window control mechanism serves multiple functions: traditional window management (minimize, maximize, close) and window docking. By allowing the same control element to transform into different states with different functions, the system eliminates the need for separate dedicated docking controls, reducing overall interface complexity while expanding functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If morphing animation is added to window controls, then user interaction becomes visually engaging and intuitive, but the system requires additional processing resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual intuitiveness of control transformationVSAvoidprocessing energy for animation rendering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The morphing animation is triggered periodically only when the user interacts with the window controls (hover or press), rather than continuously. This on-demand animation approach provides visual feedback exactly when needed for user orientation, while minimizing unnecessary processing energy consumption during idle states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of information

If docking preview is displayed, then user can anticipate window position before docking, but the interface becomes more complex with additional display elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about upcoming window positionVSAvoidcomplexity of preview display mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The docking preview acts as an intermediary visual element between the user's docking intention and the actual docking action. It shows a semi-transparent overlay of the window's future position, allowing users to anticipate the result before committing to the action. This intermediary preview is displayed only in the specific region where the window will dock, minimizing overall interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3097469B1Enhanced window control flows
Publication Date: 2022.01.12 GOOGLE LLC
  • EP3097469B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3097469B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3097469B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate generally to morphing window controls associated with a window on a display (126, 132, 142 ) of a client computing device (120, 130, 140). In order to do so, a plurality of window controls may be presented. Each window control is configured to perform an original function to control the window (310). The computing device is configured to receive (1120) a first input associated with a first one of the plurality of window controls. The first input may provide for initiating a function associated with the first window control. In response to the received first input, the original function associated with another window control is converted (1130) to an alternate function. The alternate function of the other window control is configured to perform a different task to control the window than the original function of the other window control.