Mortgage Fraud Detection via Entity-Linked Historical Pattern Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fraud detection systems in financial transactions, particularly in mortgage applications, have failed to keep pace with evolving fraudulent activities and have not leveraged the increased capabilities of computer systems, leading to a need for improved methods and systems to detect fraud effectively.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method and system that receives mortgage data, determines a fraud score based on historical transaction data using models that incorporate data from entities involved in the transaction, such as brokers and appraisers, and generates indicators of fraud by analyzing deviations from identified patterns and clusters, thereby enhancing fraud detection capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing fraud detection systems are used, then basic fraud detection is provided, but the system fails to keep pace with dynamic fraudulent activities and does not leverage increased computer capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to detect evolving fraudulent activitiesVSAvoidaccuracy of fraud detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts to evolving fraudulent activities by continuously updating its knowledge base with new fraud patterns and techniques. The fraud detection model is enhanced with machine learning algorithms that automatically learn from historical fraud data, allowing the system to evolve alongside fraudulent activities rather than remaining static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detected fraud patterns and outcomes are fed back into the knowledge base and detection models. This feedback loop enables continuous improvement of detection accuracy, allowing the system to refine its fraud detection capabilities based on actual fraud occurrence data and adjust its detection parameters accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If traditional fraud detection methods are used, then simple data analysis is performed, but the system does not take advantage of increased computer capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical data analysis methods with automated machine learning algorithms and computer vision technologies. Image processing algorithms automatically analyze property photographs and documents, while machine learning models process numerical data patterns, substituting manual analysis processes with automated intelligent systems that leverage advanced computer capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms detection parameters from simple threshold-based rules to multi-dimensional feature vectors that capture complex patterns in mortgage data. By changing the parameter representation from basic numerical thresholds to enriched feature sets including image data, temporal patterns, and relational characteristics, the system achieves higher detection accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive data analysis is performed, then fraud detection accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the comprehensive data analysis into distinct processing modules: image processing for property photographs, document analysis for mortgage documents, numerical data processing for financial information, and pattern recognition for temporal and relational data. Each module processes specific data types independently using optimized algorithms, then integrates results through a unified fraud detection model, reducing overall processing time while maintaining comprehensive analysis coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary data processing and feature extraction during the data collection phase, pre-processing images, documents, and numerical data to create ready-to-analyze feature vectors. This preliminary action reduces the computational burden during the actual fraud detection phase, allowing comprehensive analysis to be performed more efficiently by having pre-prepared data structures that require less processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8121920B2System and method of detecting mortgage related fraud
Publication Date: 2012.02.21 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US8121920B2 patent drawing
  • US8121920B2 patent drawing
  • US8121920B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include systems and methods of detecting fraud. In particular, one embodiment includes a system and method of detecting fraud in mortgage applications. For example, one embodiment includes a computerized method of detecting fraud that includes receiving mortgage data associated with an applicant and at least one entity related to processing of the mortgage data, determining a first score for the mortgage data based at least partly on a first model that is based on data from a plurality of historical mortgage transactions associated with the entity, and generating data indicative of fraud based at least partly on the first score. Other embodiments include systems and method of generating models for use in fraud detection systems.