3D MOS Capacitor Stack for Higher Capacitance in Less Area

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing semiconductor technologies face challenges in improving device performance at reduced length scales, particularly in meeting the targets for advanced capacitive devices like MOS capacitors.

Innovation Solution

The development of a semiconductor structure with an MOS capacitor design that includes a stacked structure of M1I1M2I2M3, where M1 and M2 are conductive plates and I1 and I2 are insulator layers, along with embedded structures that increase the surface area of the conductive plates, enhancing capacitance without increasing device size.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the minimum feature size is reduced to increase integration density, then more components can be integrated into a given area, but device performance deteriorates at reduced length scales

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration densityVSAvoiddevice performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from planar capacitor structures to vertically stacked three-dimensional capacitor structures. By stacking multiple capacitor units (M1-I1-M2-I2-M3 layers) vertically, the design increases the effective capacitance area without expanding the lateral footprint, thereby maintaining high integration density while preserving device performance at reduced length scales.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nested conductive plates and insulator layers where smaller capacitor structures are embedded within larger ones. The stacked configuration with embedded structures allows inner capacitor elements to be contained within the vertical stack, maximizing space utilization and maintaining performance despite miniaturization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If the capacitance is increased to improve device performance, then the capacitor size must be increased, but the device area is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performanceVSAvoidcapacitor area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by moving from two-dimensional planar capacitors to three-dimensional stacked capacitors. Multiple capacitor units are arranged vertically in the M1-I1-M2-I2-M3 stack configuration, enabling the capacitance to be increased by utilizing the vertical dimension rather than expanding the lateral area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the capacitor into multiple discrete stacked units (M1, I1, M2, I2, M3 layers) rather than using a single large planar capacitor. This segmentation allows the total capacitance to be distributed across multiple smaller vertical units, achieving high capacitance within a compact footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250040157A1Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Capacitors and Methods of Fabricating The Same
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20250040157A1 patent drawing
  • US20250040157A1 patent drawing
  • US20250040157A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor structure includes a substrate and a capacitor over the substrate. The capacitor includes a silicide layer over the substrate. The capacitor includes a first dielectric layer over the silicide layer. The capacitor includes a metal gate structure over the first dielectric layer, where a top portion of the metal gate structure is over the substrate and a bottom portion of the metal gate structure extends into the substrate. The capacitor includes a second dielectric layer over the metal gate structure. The capacitor further includes a conductive structure over the second dielectric layer.